Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 3
Last scraped
Edited on 16/05/2025, 04:28:54 UTC
I wasn't aware of that
Cool, thank you.
All it shows, like your invocation Goat above
Absolutely not. I thought it was all gross.
I thought pool hopping was brilliant. I enjoy "smart mining". (Like the dude protesting in v4 by mining empty blocks, this causes me
You've also just completely evaded the point that there doesn't appear to be any reason to think this change is a financial benefit to citrea-- as they already do what they do by bloating the utxo set, which is fine for them but bad for bitcoin.
I will respond to every sentence you wrote regarding me or my business in the near future, don't worry. If anyone evaded a question, it was achow101, but that's OK.
Again, I support removing OP_Return. I didn't think I'd ramble on it further.
Slam that shit down their throat big dog. <3
You do know y'all sound oddly in sync talking about Citrea regarding this, right? (Not that it matters, it's just weird... all of this is just weird.)
I can *easily* get around this spam filter if I want. Perhaps email spam filters should also be removed(?)
(reference my negative feedback from Midnightmagic about me bypassing my long term IRC ban.)
Bounty: 2,500 Bitcoin Testnet v4 coins
Provide proof that Greg was aware of these or other financial involvements before his post, claiming he was unaware.
As far as your question, I'm not aware of any bitcoin core contributor that has any financial interest in citrea
https://youtu.be/EKQvDfmQkt8?t=13210
Jameson Lopp openly saying that he has a financial interest.
You're referring to someone who across bitcoins history submitted a couple trivial bug fixes, something well over a thousand people have done. I wasn't aware of that
Greg, you are welcome to claim this bounty if you've thought about it further and you suddenly remember before someone else does.
You are either ignorant or a liar, and I think both are unacceptable for a person in your position. (But who cares what I think!)
not that anyone specifically has the goal of pissing you off
Same.
Version 2
Edited on 09/05/2025, 04:58:40 UTC
I wasn't aware of that
Cool, thank you.
All it shows, like your invocation Goat above
Absolutely not. I thought it was all gross.
I thought pool hopping was brilliant. I enjoy "smart mining". (Like the dude protesting in v4 by mining empty blocks, this causes me a ton of customer support tickets, but I still think it is kind of cool.)
You've also just completely evaded the point that there doesn't appear to be any reason to think this change is a financial benefit to citrea-- as they already do what they do by bloating the utxo set, which is fine for them but bad for bitcoin.
Again, I support removing OP_Return. I didn't think I'd ramble on it further.
Slam that shit down their throat big dog. <3
You do know y'all sound oddly in sync talking about Citrea regarding this, right? (Not that it matters, it's just weird... all of this is just weird.)
Version 1
Scraped on 09/05/2025, 04:33:57 UTC
I wasn't aware of that
All it shows, like your invocation Goat above
Absolutely not. I thought it was all gross.
You've also just completely evaded the point that there doesn't appear to be any reason to think this change is a financial benefit to citrea-- as they already do what they do by bloating the utxo set, which is fine for them but bad for bitcoin.
Again, I support removing OP_Return. I didn't think I'd ramble on it further.
Slam that shit down their throat big dog. <3
Original archived Re: Removing OP_return limits seems like a huge mistake
Scraped on 09/05/2025, 04:28:39 UTC
I wasn't aware of that
Thanks.
All it shows, like your invocation Goat above
Absolutely not. I thought it was all gross.