[...]
As you can see, the betting techniques which you used breach the above and as a result, the funds were retained. What the events or the bets were doesnt matter, the fashion in which the bets were placed, does.
Please note that any suspicious betting activity is flagged to us by our sportsbook provider Betby, they carry out the investigations and provide us with the outcome. In this particular instance, the suspicious bets were placed right at the same moment when the event occurred or extremely close to it. I'm only able to provide you with as much details as Betby shares with us, and this is the extent we receive.
If you have any further questions, we are happy to answer them, but the decision on the matter is final.
I have almost the same curiosity as what AHOYBRAUSE said above, but... perhaps slightly differ. I don't speak DOTA, so I have to ask particular someone who spent hours of their life daily playing it to gain a better insight of what's possible to be considered as suspicious, and correct me if I am wrong, but basically OP was marked as suspicious bettor because he placed bet? And that's it. He placed bets. Because from what we can see from his betting history, "the events" are basically he picking who win.
This is not a time-specific event like in other game that say a goal will be made under minute 40 or 15 three points shots are made during first half. His betting history basically [far as I know from the crash course given to me] was just picking a team to win.
Anyone familiar with the Dota scene will tell you there is absolutely nothing suspicious about my bets. They are matches of the highest tier in the game as you can see, they are considered S-tier by betby, which is the highest. Matches between the best teams in the world, on LAN, for a million dollar prizepool. They can't even tell the lie of "oh he placed bets on shady matches, or matchfix matches". There's none of that.