Re: Removing OP_return limits seems like a huge mistake

Version 1

Last scraped

Scraped on 12/05/2025, 06:30:54 UTC

Quote from: d5000 on May 12, 2025, 12:55:12 AM

Edit: [1] there is actually a way to require that the keys must create a spendable output, but this still allows to stuff data into these fake public keys, albeit a little bit less.

Are you talking about public keys with a proof of knowledge of the private key (i.e. a signature) ?
IfWhile you ~~mean that~~can set some output bits ~~can be set~~ by grinding, ~~then it~~that would be not a little bit less, but MUCH less. ~~What other way is there to store data in fake outputs?~~

Original archived Re: Removing OP_return limits seems like a huge mistake

Scraped on 12/05/2025, 06:25:47 UTC

Quote from: d5000 on May 12, 2025, 12:55:12 AM

Edit: [1] there is actually a way to require that the keys must create a spendable output, but this still allows to stuff data into these fake public keys, albeit a little bit less.

If you mean that some output bits can be set by grinding, then it would be not a little bit less, but MUCH less. What other way is there to store data in fake outputs?