You could actually be right. Something feels different from the old Bestchange approach, and the way some of these exchangers are listed leaves a lot of question marks. Some of the exchangers don't even have any necessary public information like operating licenses displayed on their websites, and yet they somehow end up getting listed. If we are to go by the strict KYC/AML protocol that Bestchange aim to operate with in, then there is still a big loopehole for even scams taking up people's documents and money in the name of KYC
LOL, that is exactly what you do now!!!!!!!!!!!also this AML/KYC FATF fulles you actively promoting forced into the clients you and your scam exchangers ripped of but still some how you dont aply this rules to you scam exchangers, how convenient init, mate?
Bestchange is Two faced scumbags
We haven’t changed our selection criteria for services or our approach to running the business. All the services that people now say 'used to be better' have been working with us for an average of 5+ years. So if we take your argument seriously, it would mean that several hundred exchangers suddenly decided to break their obligations — which sounds more like a conspiracy theory than a reasonable claim.
TOTAL LIE, don't believe a single word this crooks sayagain, Bestchange has become a Two faces professional bullshitterZ
If we look at your concerns more closely, they’re not actually about us changing our list of services or some alleged negligence on our part. Instead, they stem from new market regulations that started in 2020, after European regulators published crypto custody rules. Like everyone else, we’re unwilling victims of these global changes — not the ones driving them.
unwilling victims you say??? yeh sure, LOL
why then not a single exchanger you promoting has any sort of information about their company, address or, i am afraid to ask, license?
why are all of them hidden behind anonymity?
where is you so called client oriented policy? scam only