Quote from: Ultegra134 on Today at 09:39:37 AM

Anyway, something relevant to the topic, am I the only one "struggling" in a way to find AI posts? I mean, it seems that newbies flocking the forum with AI aren't that common anymore, or they've become smarter and I'm no longer recognize them. I even remember this thread being more active than it currently is.

One way of looking at it is this thread is an effective deterrence of using AI to write posts. But realistically, account farmers are likely getting better at "humanizing" posts so they don't show up on the AI detectors. I can still find them, but usually not by high ranking accounts who either know better or else just don't want to risk the account getting tagged.

Here's a good one; this user should probably be nuked as these are their only 3 posts:

armex2345

#1

Quote from: armex2345 on May 13, 2025, 02:06:34 AM

When it comes to deciding whether to hold or offload your crypto, especially Bitcoin, most people are driven by speculation or uncertainty — and honestly, that’s understandable. But in my view, these decisions shouldn’t come from panic or gut feelings alone.

Instead, they deserve thoughtful analysis. Ask yourself: What’s the broader economic context? What’s the technology behind the coin? Why was it created, and by whom? What real-world problems does it aim to solve?

Take Bitcoin — it’s steadily becoming more embedded in the global financial conversation. With its increasing adoption and growing utility, there’s a lot of long-term potential to consider.

Sapling: 100% Fake
Stealthwriter: 78% AI Detected
Quillbot: 60% of text is likely AI

#2

Quote from: armex2345 on May 12, 2025, 09:20:12 AM

$150 a month feels pretty steep!

That said, the tool does look impressive—seems snappier, and the filters could come in handy.

It’s missing a few key features though. Not being able to tweak the search text is a bit of a letdown since that’s pretty important for narrowing things down.

I’m curious enough to dig in a bit more.

Would you like variations that are more professional, casual, or critical?

Its this last line that makes it a dead giveaway the post was AI generated as it is asking the user if they want the output regenerated. The fact that the detectors give the following results means they are still not very good, but it could be that the text is too short to for sufficient analysis.

Sapling: 98.7% Fake
Stealthwriter: 68% AI Detected
Quillbot: not enough words
Undetectable: 99% human ("Input at least 200 words for the most accurate result")
GPTZero: 42% AI generated
ZeroGPT: 0% AI GPT
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated

#3 - removed the last line as it was clearly added by the poster

Quote from: armex2345 on May 13, 2025, 04:21:00 PM

Imbalance and market structure shifts are powerful signals for serious traders. When price aggressively moves in one direction, leaving inefficiencies or "imbalances" behind, it often hints at institutional activity. Combine that with a break in market structure—a change from higher highs to lower lows (or vice versa)—and you’ve got a roadmap for potential reversals or trend continuation. These moments expose where liquidity lies and where smart money may strike next. Don’t trade blind; read the structure, track the shifts, and let imbalance reveal where the market is truly leaning. Precision comes from observing what others overlook.If you be with me than you learn and apply diffrent type of strategy in your trading journey.

~~to be continue.....~~

Sapling: 86.8% Fake
Stealthwriter: 83% AI Detected
GPTZero: We are highly confident this text was AI generated