Quote from: Bitcoin Smith on Today at 07:56:58 PM

Quote from: coupable on Today at 06:31:44 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin Smith on Today at 05:33:57 PM

India is not the only one who decides who carried out the terrorist operation and whether the targets were terrorist camps or military camps. India took a very hasty position by accusing Pakistan of planning the terrorist operation and subsequently took escalatory steps. My analysis is that India would not have done this without external incitement from powers with interests far from the reality of the war between the two countries. The Western powers believed that the weapons they sold to India would be able to end the crisis in record time, in a clear challenge to the Chinese weapons possessed by Pakistan. What happened was a true farce that revealed the extent of the development of the Chinese military industry and the backwardness of the latest Western weapons.

In short, India is the one who insisted on entering into a military confrontation without regard for any diplomatic procedures or rational logic. This is true folly that has plunged the country into a crisis that no one knows how or when it will end. Usually, no one emerges victorious from these wars, especially with two nuclear powers capable of setting fire to the entire planet. Therefore, I accuse the Indian government of pushing towards war and taking a huge risk that will cost India more than expected.

They entered into a country and killed the civilians then what do you expect a country to react?

Investigations needed to reveal the full story of who is behind this. But It is proven multiple times that Pakistan sponsored terrorism to attack India for example 2008 blast carried out by LeT organization operating in Pakistan and US confirmed it too and then in 2016 and then in 2019 and a few hundred times so we need to turn back the history to know the full story.

And I am asking again if the same thing happened in the USA how they will react? Anyone can answer my question. Roll Eyes

Please feel free to.

Even if the United States did this against any country, it would not be a wise decision, and it would be considered the initiator of the aggression. A clear example of this is the events of September 11, 2001, which no one doubts was a terrorist act. The United States accused bin Laden and al-Qaeda of masterminding the terrorist plot and then bombed Afghanistan without understanding what Afghanistan had to do with it, given that bin Laden was Saudi and none of the 9/11 hijackers held Afghan citizenship. Millions were killed and displaced as a result of an ill-advised retaliatory response that cost the United States many times what it lost in 2001. There are countless examples, all of which were examples of regional wars in which no one wins and which cause devastation for both sides.

Returning to India, there are numerous measures that can be taken before reaching the decision to go to war to spare the country from destruction and attempt to respond appropriately with minimal damage. India believed it was stronger than Pakistan, and if it had known its capabilities would be so shamefully limited, it would not have made such a foolish decision. Pakistan defied everyone's expectations and went beyond the pretext of a terrorist act to now talk about a response to the Indian aggression, given that its territory was targeted with military weapons.

Doesn't the scenario cross your mind that someone had created a problem to ignite war between the two countries? What if India had planned the operation to find a pretext to fight Pakistan? You might find this strange, but returning to the American example, there are secret reports discussing the hypothesis that the events of September 11, 2001, were fabricated by US intelligence to create a pretext for military intervention in Afghanistan under the pretext of spreading democracy. I'm not surprised by the plausibility of any hypothesis, no matter how outlandish it may seem.