Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Edited on 21/05/2025, 18:22:52 UTC
And maybe their purchase made create good movements and contribute on the situation that's why we see Bitcoin cross at $100k again. There's lots of things we can learn for reading that article about the actions done by 21 capital.
This is interesting: I would have assumed that Tether would have used some of the bitcoins already in their reserve to finance 21 Capital.
Of course, the open market buy helps a positive price development!

Even if one entity buys from another entity (meaning XXI buying from Tether), there does not necessarily need to be a market impact, so Tether could have had sold the bitcoin to XXI... so that on paper, XXI shows that they showacquired the BTC at the price asof $95k-ish each... but  even though like you said, the funds were largely seeded from Tether's earlier purchased coins.   Are they

Is XXI
restricted from engaging in those kinds of arrangements or do they have to have "armsarm's length" relations when it comes to coin acquisitions?
Original archived Re: 21 Capital: A Bitcoin Native Company
Scraped on 14/05/2025, 18:22:58 UTC
And maybe their purchase made create good movements and contribute on the situation that's why we see Bitcoin cross at $100k again. There's lots of things we can learn for reading that article about the actions done by 21 capital.
This is interesting: I would have assumed that Tether would have used some of the bitcoins already in their reserve to finance 21 Capital.
Of course, the open market buy helps a positive price development!

Even if one entity buys from another entity, there does not necessarily need to be a market impact, so Tether could have had sold the bitcoin to XXI... so that on paper, they show the price as $95k-ish... but the funds were largely seeded from earlier purchased coins.  Are they restricted from engaging in those kinds of arrangements or do they have to have "arms length" relations when it comes to coin acquisitions?