Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 3
Last scraped
Edited on 21/05/2025, 22:37:25 UTC
And no one has yet come up with a way that this *benefits* citrea-- their stuff just uses fake outputs in these rare exception-case transactions so they don't need opreturn, they only came up because someone noticed that they'd cause less harm to the utxo set if they could use it.
Seems like a pretty big benefit to not have to use their work around and just go straight to goal... right?
Less code & BS the better? (This likely is a reason to remove OP_return as well, perhaps?)
Also the question was about *ordinals*, but thanks for both demonstrating my point and showing that you're not bothering to read the discussion you're responding to.
The original post is about OP_Return. I think the question relates to my reply. If you think I'm offtopic, just report my post to a forum mod...
You are either ignorant or a liar, and I think both are unacceptable for a person in your position.
And what "position" is that?
O wait, being a forum mod in this very section is one of your positions, isn't it!
. Well fuck me! (lol). Seems like you, me, and everyone else should have known at least one answer to your own I hate to say this, but your personal pokes at me kinda show how hard your trying to
"By one's own hand"
Go write some code dude. Actions speak louder than words.
Edit: It seems I found one that works. https://conft.app/wallet/citrea_testnet/0x5f8f7a5edd6867f4322c43f82c8632f4b36e677e/launched
Version 2
Edited on 14/05/2025, 23:07:37 UTC
And no one has yet come up with a way that this *benefits* citrea-- their stuff just uses fake outputs in these rare exception-case transactions so they don't need opreturn, they only came up because someone noticed that they'd cause less harm to the utxo set if they could use it.
Seems like a pretty big benefit to not have to use their work around and just go straight to goal... right?
Less code & BS the better?
Also the question was about *ordinals*, but thanks for both demonstrating my point and showing that you're not bothering to read the discussion you're responding to.
The original post is about OP_Return.
You are either ignorant or a liar, and I think both are unacceptable for a person in your position.
And what "position" is that?O wait,
. Well fuck me! (lol). Seems like you should have known at least one answer to your own questions!I hate to say this, but your personal pokes at me kinda show how hard your trying to gaslight in this subject for "whatever reason". I support this, ram
This will help making a "wrapped" Bitcoin Testnet that can be traded on "decentralized" exchanges, which will be really fun to research. I'm fucking stoked tbh. My theory is decentralized exchanges are trash, but I'll let the data shape my opinion.
Go write some code dude. Actions speak louder than words.
I'm over here trying to use their "work around" on any of the apps they have listed and thus far... it feels like the North Korea grocery store scene in The Interview.
Version 1
Scraped on 14/05/2025, 22:42:26 UTC
And no one has yet come up with a way that this *benefits* citrea-- their stuff just uses fake outputs in these rare exception-case transactions so they don't need opreturn, they only came up because someone noticed that they'd cause less harm to the utxo set if they could use it.
Seems like a pretty big benefit to not have to use their work around and just go straight to goal... right?
Less code & BS the better?
Also the question was about *ordinals*, but thanks for both demonstrating my point and showing that you're not bothering to read the discussion you're responding to.
The original post is about OP_Return. Are you
And what "position" is that?
O wait, that is one of your positions isn't it!
. Well fuck me!I hate to say this, but your personal pokes at
Go write some code dude. Actions speak louder than words.
Original archived Re: Removing OP_return limits seems like a huge mistake
Scraped on 14/05/2025, 22:37:28 UTC
And no one has yet come up with a way that this *benefits* citrea-- their stuff just uses fake outputs in these rare exception-case transactions so they don't need opreturn, they only came up because someone noticed that they'd cause less harm to the utxo set if they could use it.
Seems like a pretty big benefit to not have to use their work around and just go straight to goal... right?
Less code & BS the better?
Also the question was about *ordinals*, but thanks for both demonstrating my point and showing that you're not bothering to read the discussion you're responding to.
The original post is about OP_Return. Are you offtopic because I will not hesitate to file a complaint with the mods of this sections of the forum!
And what "position" is that?
O wait, that is one of your positions isn't it!
. Well fuck me!I hate to say this, but your personal pokes at my disabilities kinda show how hard your trying to gaslight...
Go write some code dude.