Un-necessary thus likely undesirable coersion.

It should suffice to deploy market-maker bots, even very simplistic like the Stellar bot KELP's so called "balanced" mode which assumes the central/balanced price in a pair is precisentlyprecisenly the rationratio that bot holds of one side of the pair to anotherthe other.

Any speculative activity that moves the price any reasonable / significant amount must, on any platform such bots are operating on, either buy from or sell to such bots, thus autkmatigicallyautomatigically simple deployment of such bots on most/all trading venues should suffice to endow any humanitrianhumanitarian organisation or foundation with operating funds proportional to the encountered price volatility combinecombined with the (presumably ever-growing) size of the holdings of the bots.

Thus all mentions of any implied or implicit coercive charging of fees in the initial post's proposal should be completely discardable, which maybe might leave other parts of it remaining to possibly have some redeeming value, haven't bothered looking farther into the whole kit-and-kaboodle beyond the glaring impression the whole thing is fundamentally based on a coercive approach / intention / motive.


-MarkM-

Un-necessary thus likely undesirable coersion.

It should suffice to deploy market-maker bots, even very simplistic like the Stellar bot KELP's so called "balanced" mode which assumes the central/balanced price in a pair is precisently the ration that bot holds of one side of the pair to another.

Any speculative activity that moves the price any reasonable / significant amount must, on any platform such bots are operating on, either buy from or sell to such bots, thus autkmatigically simple deployment of such bots on most/all trading venues should suffice to endow any humanitrian organisation or foundation with operating funds proportional to the encountered price volatility combine with the (presumably ever-growing) size of the holdings of the bots.

Thus all mentions of any implied or implicit coercive charging of fees in the initial post's proposal should be completely discardable, which maybe might leave other parts of it remaining to possibly have some redeeming value, haven't bothered looking farther into the whole kit-and-kaboodle beyond the glaring impression the whole thing is coercive.


-MarkM-