Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 16/05/2025, 13:51:58 UTC
I think I can be phrased that even better i mean like  full consensus multisig
if exactly we have "3-of-3" or "5-of-5 " where everyone is agrees
Like if I already set these 3 of 3 there after if anyone refuses then do I have a chance to remove and recover that's I want to knew weather legally or in any way
If it is 3-of-3 or in a way the it is n-of-n, if the person die or something happened in a way he do not want to cooperate, you will lose the coin because all of you must sign any transaction you are making using the multisig set up. It is better you have m-of-n instead. I mean the signers should be lesser in casenumber than those involved in setting up the wallet.
Original archived Re: What happen if one of the people in my multiSig setup became a problem later?
Scraped on 16/05/2025, 13:47:03 UTC
I think I can be phrased that even better i mean like  full consensus multisig
if exactly we have "3-of-3" or "5-of-5 " where everyone is agrees
Like if I already set these 3 of 3 there after if anyone refuses then do I have a chance to remove and recover that's I want to knew weather legally or in any way
If it is 3-of-3 or in a way the it is n-of-n, if the person die or something happened in a way he do not want to cooperate, you will lose the coin because all of you must sign any transaction you are making using the multisig set up. It is better you have m-of-n instead. I mean the signers should be lesser in case.