I think that there is some weirdness going on, since you are saying that you took a couple of the forks (perhaps remaining forks), but you are suggesting that you did not take the BCH fork, yet whoever took the BCH fork may have returned the BCH fork to the compromised address, but then someone else took those BCH coins a second time since the private keys of the original address were already compromised.

So in terms of JohnGalt, I wonder if he received any of the forked coins back?  

Sure, I am not sure if JohnGalt deserves the forked coins that were taken outside of his permission, since he had compromised his private keys, even though sure, there could be some kind of a benevolent sharing of the value of the coins that were taken with JohnGalt if the person who had tooktaken the forked coins were to choose such a sharing course of action...

I think that there is some weirdness going on, since you are saying that you took a couple of the forks (perhaps remaining forks), but you are suggesting that you did not take the BCH fork, yet whoever took the BCH fork may have returned the BCH fork to the compromised address, but then someone else took those BCH coins a second time since the private keys of the original address were already compromised.

So in terms of JohnGalt, I wonder if he received any of the forked coins back? 

Sure, I am not sure if JohnGalt deserves the coins, since he had compromised his private keys, even though sure, there could be some kind of a sharing of the value of the coins that were taken with JohnGalt if the person who had took the coins were to choose such sharing course of action...