Quote from: Virtuose on Today at 11:35:50 PM

Quote from: Frequence on Today at 11:27:39 PM

Quote from: Virtuose on Today at 11:13:05 PM

Quote from: bitstonps on Today at 10:59:20 PM

Quote from: Virtuose on Today at 10:34:46 PM

Quote from: Frequence on Today at 10:32:50 PM

Quote from: Virtuose on Today at 10:27:02 PM

Quote from: Frequence on Today at 09:50:13 PM

Quote from: Virtuose on Today at 09:33:37 PM

Quote from: Wanderingaran on Today at 10:05:41 AM

Quote from: user_not_here on Today at 09:47:27 AM

Quote from: Virtuose on May 07, 2025, 11:29:09 PM

Quote from: Benjade on May 07, 2025, 09:48:14 PM

Quote from: analyticnomad on May 07, 2025, 08:34:54 PM

Just curios,

What hardware is everyone running for these puzzles? Whats the dream setup for you guys?

I'm only using my Rog Strix 16 CPU laptop, not the GPU because I'm trying to find the right code that would minimize resources. I'm still looking after it Cheesy

Congratulations on the new KeyQuest V1.3, it's by far the fastest for CPU. I tried KeyHunt, Cyclone (all 3 versions) and yours surpasses all in speed by at least 4 MKeys/s. Nice coding. Thanks.
Also I really like your Minto.day pool, great frontend mate !

This tells it all.

The man is just good at marketing. He promotes himself with duplicate user accounts, nothing more. He’s not even half as good as the Digarans. We are the strongest in the universe. We are half-human, half-AI. Cool

Your post alone shows just how out of touch and downright paranoid some people on this forum are, making up stories and whole lives for themselves. If you honestly think Benjade and I are the same person, you need a good psychiatris and maybe a prescription for Xanax. I could’ve quoted someone else, but of all the programs I’ve tested, only Benjade’s works flawlessly (and Retiredcoder’s for pubkeys). Keyhunt by JLP used to be an option, but it’s clearly outdated now.

So when guys start patting themselves on the back and acting like geniuses, it really pisses me off because they can’t even release a working script. Publishing code that won’t run is like selling a car without an engine: it’s worthless. Beginners see that junk, think they can crack a key with it, rent a server for nothing, and waste their money. Some folks here need to climb down from their pedestals, show a little humility, and quit treating everyone like fools.

I have noticed that you promoted mintoday .. And guess what ? you know the answer.
Btw, incredible work on the forkk I'm mining on that pool with a solid hashrate.

Promoted ? Cheesy

you are funny dude.. You are Date Registered: April 15, 2025 and you are acting like you where here for decade LOL Nice trolling Cheesy

I have multiple accounts, just too lazy to log out and reply from a different one

Okay, well, I think we all understand, "I have multiple accounts" that says it all.

Like I said, I’ve got multiple accounts across different devices, each with random passwords generated by gg. For security, I don’t bother using the same account everywhere. Yeah, I have a few accounts, yes I have an old account on this forum and I use that account only when it is necessary, but I’m not the type to pat myself on the back by commenting or liking my own posts from another account just to boost my ego. When I say I’m lazy, I mean it I usually don’t even comment or engage much. I mostly just lurk and read different perspectives. bbut here, you went after nomachine1. It doesn’t seem like you’re trying to have a real conversation; it feels more like you’re just trying to kill the vibe. If you don’t like something, why not just move on?! Why all the negativity !?
Sure, the code might look like junk to you, but someone else could find it useful. We all know cracking this puzzle takes serious GPU power. Without the hardware, most scripts are pretty much useless. But bring the GPUs, and things change fast the script practically writes itself. People here are just tossing around ideas. It’s not always about solving the puzzle outright sometimes it’s about sparking thoughts that could lead to something bigger down the road.
Puzzle 71 has, what, 1.18 sextillion possibilities? Good luck getting a supercomputer to crack that anytime soon. Still ffolks are sharing ideas, trying new approaches,, and experimenting with stuff that might pay off later. No need to tear anyone down we’re all just human, you know.

Your multiple account story thing doesn't work for me. Someone who has nothing to hide doesn't need multiple accounts LOL
Whatever, but really whatever. Yeah, everyone's human, it's true, but beginners who come here still have hopes, maybe to find the key to the next puzzle because they don't know the real difficulty. You have no idea how many people rent CPU or GPU servers in the hope of finding a key and living better days. I've been in crypto for a long time, I know what I'm talking about, it's the same here. And they're not going to find it with rag scripts; they're just misleading people. Especially if the script in question gives fake private keys and a bad calculation for high-value keys. If I hadn't said it, who would have? When you expose yourself, you have to be able to accept criticism, even if it's harsh; it allows you to improve. If Nomachine took it badly, that's his problem, but he could have easily laughed about it, so maybe it's because he knows he's making a mess.

bro, I've got my own reasons, this forum 2015 database caused some major headaches, especially with a Simple Machine scripts. totally agree with you on scripts, which is why we test them, lol. If you compare JLC's Kangaroo to RC s version, the difference is night and day. Do you think RC would share their work if someone was disrespecting them?!! Nah, they’d probably just peace out and go fishing. anyway, development’s still chugging along here, and I hope you all keep the convo going. srsly, I wish you the best of luck finding that key, I mean it Wink

Well, I'm only running someone's CPU script on a server, I'm not going to name the person anymore otherwise they'll tell me I'm him again. But it's exactly the same as my little 4th miner on Bitcoin, I'm playing the lottery, nothing more.

@virtuose Wishing you tons of success with all your projects.

@Nomachine, yoo, We need a Windows v for the Cyclone to test the SE parameter. Could you tweak the code to stop repeating the same key?!! I ran into this issue with JLC’s edited version. If there are, say, 1,000,000 possible keys, the script might nail the key in seconds (like within 10,000 tries), but other times it takes 10,000,000 tries! That’s straight up nonsense clearly, it’s reusing keys and wasting resources. Can you make sure your script avoids that? Thnx