Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Edited on 26/05/2025, 19:15:22 UTC
Bad news for the attackers and nonsense hallucinators! 
The Curacao GamingControl BoardAuthority (GCBCGA) just confirmed that I have a claim against Stake:
Below is the information and proof I sent to them about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack:
Info 1)
The advertised house edge for Stake's in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means long-term I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.
However, if you take a look at my Stake bets statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:
Bets: 180,904
Wins: 78,285
Losses: 86,612
If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)
Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.
0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.
8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.
Info 2)
Bets
After 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%, according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3) below).
180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.
7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additionally maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
House edge
0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets maximal possible deviation = 80% additional maximal possible deviation from the house edge.
0,5% house edge plus 0,4% (80% additional maximal possible deviation) = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge!
Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% additional experienced house edge!
3,7% additional experienced house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible deviation = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
Stake's own bets statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 3)
When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.
The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.
Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:
A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
What does 99,7% mean?
When you make 333 times a series of 180,000 coin flips, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.
I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.
The Curacao Gaming
Quote from: GCBCGA
Thank you for contacting the Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA).
Your message will be forwarded to the relevant department for review.
If further information is needed, we may reach out to you.
Please be aware that, in cases involving complaints related to gambling activities, the CGA does not have the authority to mediate disputes between players and gaming operators. As such, we do not handle complaints on an individual basis.
However, your complaint is valuable to us, as it may highlight potential breaches of the law by operators.
If such violations are identified, appropriate enforcement measures will be taken.
Please note that we cannot provide you with updates on the status of any ongoing investigations or actions.
If you wish to pursue your claim further, we recommend seeking legal counsel.
We appreciate your understanding.
Best regards,
Your message will be forwarded to the relevant department for review.
If further information is needed, we may reach out to you.
Please be aware that, in cases involving complaints related to gambling activities, the CGA does not have the authority to mediate disputes between players and gaming operators. As such, we do not handle complaints on an individual basis.
However, your complaint is valuable to us, as it may highlight potential breaches of the law by operators.
If such violations are identified, appropriate enforcement measures will be taken.
Please note that we cannot provide you with updates on the status of any ongoing investigations or actions.
If you wish to pursue your claim further, we recommend seeking legal counsel.
We appreciate your understanding.
Best regards,
Below is the information and proof I sent to them about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack:
Info 1)
The advertised house edge for Stake's in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means long-term I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.
However, if you take a look at my Stake bets statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:
Bets: 180,904
Wins: 78,285
Losses: 86,612
If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)
Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.
0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.
8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.
Info 2)
Bets
After 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%, according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3) below).
180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.
7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additionally maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
House edge
0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets maximal possible deviation = 80% additional maximal possible deviation from the house edge.
0,5% house edge plus 0,4% (80% additional maximal possible deviation) = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge!
Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% additional experienced house edge!
3,7% additional experienced house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible deviation = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
Stake's own bets statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 3)
When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.
The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.
Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:
A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
What does 99,7% mean?
When you make 333 times a series of 180,000 coin flips, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.
I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.
Original archived Re: 🚨 STAKE.COM’S RTP IS A SCAM! MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
Scraped on 19/05/2025, 19:15:15 UTC
Bad news for the attackers and nonsense hallucinators!
The Curacao Gaming Control Board (GCB) just confirmed that I have a claim against Stake:
The Curacao Gaming Control Board (GCB) just confirmed that I have a claim against Stake:
Quote from: GCB
Thank you for contacting the Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA).
Your message will be forwarded to the relevant department for review.
If further information is needed, we may reach out to you.
Please be aware that, in cases involving complaints related to gambling activities, the CGA does not have the authority to mediate disputes between players and gaming operators. As such, we do not handle complaints on an individual basis.
However, your complaint is valuable to us, as it may highlight potential breaches of the law by operators.
If such violations are identified, appropriate enforcement measures will be taken.
Please note that we cannot provide you with updates on the status of any ongoing investigations or actions.
If you wish to pursue your claim further, we recommend seeking legal counsel.
We appreciate your understanding.
Best regards,
Your message will be forwarded to the relevant department for review.
If further information is needed, we may reach out to you.
Please be aware that, in cases involving complaints related to gambling activities, the CGA does not have the authority to mediate disputes between players and gaming operators. As such, we do not handle complaints on an individual basis.
However, your complaint is valuable to us, as it may highlight potential breaches of the law by operators.
If such violations are identified, appropriate enforcement measures will be taken.
Please note that we cannot provide you with updates on the status of any ongoing investigations or actions.
If you wish to pursue your claim further, we recommend seeking legal counsel.
We appreciate your understanding.
Best regards,