Quote from: Algominer2 on Today at 01:45:29 PM

Some really interesting perspectives here.

Part of what I see dividing people's opinions is whether BTC is perceived as a store of value or currency. As a currency I definitely think pricing in sats makes more sense than a chocolate bar being priced as a tiny fraction of a bitcoin.

As I said, why not use both depending where it makes more sense? I don't want to pay for real estate hundreds of millions of a unit, the same way I don't want to pay a tiny fraction of a Bitcoin for something so cheap.

Quote from: Algominer2 on Today at 01:45:29 PM

To those that say surely people don't think 1 btc is the smallest value, I can assure you that they do. I actually hazard a guess that if 1 BTC gets to $1million (hopefully it will!) and you randomly stopped people in the street and ask people how much money you need to buy "some" bitcoin, they say you'd need to be a millionaire. I think we crypto bro's often forget how alien this all still is to the masses.

The existence of such people is not in question. What is in question is whether you should pay them any attention. Those people don't know anything about finances or investing either, you don't see the financial world making changes because some people don't understand fractional ownership?