T is a businessman (in the past). He just proposeedproposed a "merger", not sure why it was taken so negatively as it was just a suggestion with no aggressive moves to accompany such suggestions.
Strategically, Greenland would be better off with US for obvious reasons [it already had, as was revealed publicly recently, a US nuclear base https://www.wsj.com/world/greenland-us-camp-century-nuclear-base-91e8abea], but politically, I understand why this is not a popular opinion.

Finally, that "agreement" is worth zippo if US really "wanted" Greenland, which it does not, in all seriosness.
So...nothing changes.

I am not sure why yellow pages always write about 'humiliations', 'upsets', etc. when talking about economic relationships.
I found out that British are always very reserved in person and in public, and justly so, but quite outlandish in their writings.
Must be some sort of compensation, indeed.  

T is a businessman (in the past). He just proposeed a "merger", not sure why it was taken so negatively as it was just a suggestion with no aggressive moves to accompany such suggestions.
Strategically, Greenland would be better off with US for obvious reasons [it already had, as was revealed publicly recently, a US nuclear base https://www.wsj.com/world/greenland-us-camp-century-nuclear-base-91e8abea], but politically, I understand why this is not a popular opinion.

Finally, that "agreement" is worth zippo if US really "wanted" Greenland, which it does not, in all seriosness.
So...nothing changes.

I am not sure why yellow pages always write about 'humiliations', 'upsets', etc. when talking about economic relationships.
I found out that British are always very reserved in person and in public, and justly so, but quite outlandish in their writings.
Must be some sort of compensation, indeed