Yeah I agree with you, I really don’t think anything holydarkness says or does is gonna magically get the casino to pay the op.
And as for whether bc lied or scammed the op, the court already made that clear. they ruled in the op’s favor, along with 3 others.
So there shouldn’t be any doubt at all about who’s in the wrong here. It's bc games. full stop. And they should be called out publicly so other players know what they’re dealing with.
At this point, there’s really nothing more the op or holydarkness can do.
A friendly advice here, next time you derail someone's thread and the situation they have, to satisfy your selfish need to paint me certain color, as always, try to read the posts and understand the situation? That way you wont make a fool of yourself and will have more weight to your words.
It has even been clearly pointed here through discussion between me and OP, in several posts, that there were no ruling by court in favor of OP. That is what make this things difficult. Because otherwise I'll be able to just kick my contact's ass and tell them to pay according to court's rule. Without it, we're here, trying to dissect why and how CG come with that verdict.
So, go busy yourself with that image of, "the court already made that clear. they ruled in the op’s favor, along with 3 others." I'll wait here.
Ha ha ha… you sound like you need a hug

.
I'm no law student but even I can highlight where the op mentions winning a court case against bcgame:
Initial claim of winning the lawsuit:Later on, I've (and other players) filed a lawsuit against them for not fulfilling claims, which we won. And they were declared bankrupt. Only to avoid paying out our winnings and switch jurisdiction.
Further clarification:8 - They were declared bankrupt by court of Curacao because they were ignoring the ruling and court appointed trustee.
And here:- Considering they refused to provide guarantee note from the bank (which in any legal terms, they are not liquid), Court of Appeal declared them bankrupt and assign bankruptcy trustee (representative who will ensure that all claims are attended and if there is successful liquidation, claimants get funds disbursed as per laws.
At this point, trustee (Nagelmakers) reviews all the players' claims against BC.game and decide that all of those are valid (as there was insufficient evidence from BC.game) and that in terms of successful liquidation, all players will be provided with the funds they were owed to.
If you still don’t understand my point let me break it down further for you:
1. The op and other players won a legal judgment in Curaçao, leading to bc.game’s bankruptcy declaration.
2. bc.game did not comply with the ruling, leading to a trustee being appointed who confirmed the validity of the claims.
It's either you are dense or maybe you are intentionally obtuse. You sound crazy and your delusions seem to be on overdrive.
Thanks for the support, but I would appreciate if you could tone down a bit and refrain from personal attacks. I do still pretty much appreciate what holydarkness is doing with dissecting this case to the tiniest bit, as it appears that based off of his questions I am getting to even more findings of what could have happened here.
Peace.