While everyone fears trade would make children lazy, school already teaches kids to pursue outside rewards. If we are afraid of danger, why are we quiet about the risk of ignorance? Letting Wall Street define financial expertise as elite runs a more serious risk. Mandatory lessons, but with an eye toward loss, prejudice, and critical thinking rather than rich quick, Why should fundamental biology be less taboo than market mechanics? If you must, make it elective; nevertheless, avoiding practical economics in the classroom is a kind of designed helplessness. Maybe we’re overdue for a generation that knows the game, not just the rules
Naturally, people are afraid because they will give a view to children that schools are not far more important and they will prefer to take classes related to trade.
Defining may be easy but the application is far more difficult and we never know what percentage of success can be achieved when the view of trade is a method that can bring someone rich and pursue this reward has a large level of risk in the age of children who are still inclined to need education in the formal sector.
This is not about avoiding, but not yet time for school children thinking about the level of income beyond their thoughts and vice versa is more important to meet the assumptions of sustainable educational.
It is better to be applied to the university so that they can make choices at a much more mature age, although the level of success in trade also does not determine because not everyone can succeed there.