Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: ⚠️SCAM⚠️ BC.game - refusing to pay $1.5m, switched jurisdiction to avoid paying
by
holydarkness
on 26/05/2025, 15:55:56 UTC
Ha ha ha…  you sound like you need a hug  Kiss.

You sound like you need to read the beslissing [#22]. Point us out where the verdict of the court that ruled in OP's favor is?

I'm no law student but even I can highlight where the op mentions winning a court case against bcgame:
[...]

Clearly. Otherwise you'll read the beslissing, which literally the court's decision, instead of posts laced with arguments.

I'll safe your face by snip those part of the posts from your quoted text. As well as to ensure that you didn't accidentally mislead people into thinking OP deliberately twist the narrative here as the posts you quoted as the "verdict" of the court, clearly bring different narrative with the actual verdict of the court.

Now, I'll leave you unaddressed from this point forward, to minimize the chance of further derailment. If you want to go with your agenda to paint me certain color, please do that in other thread. Not this one. This one is already confusing enough, and OP's fate is hanging at a balance here, I'll appreciate if you leave this one be instead of toying with OP's future just to satisfy your selfishness.



[...]
I did sold my phones back in 2024 as I had to cover losses from my case in Indonesia, but those were wiped before handing them over, so I presume no "unique identification" should possibly conflict with my information. The only possible reason for that third account to be mine is Cloudflare IP address, as I previously said I used Cloudflare WARP (1.1.1.1) DNS and it appears that WARP option does give you public (shared) ip address. To the best of my knowledge as of this time, this could be a single reason for that third account to be flagged as mine. If they ever provided any information, I would've been more than happy to defend myself based on that info. [...]

First of all, sorry that I snip half of your post it's too long, and my reply will be long too, and we create an enormous wall of text. Thus, I snip to the relevant point I wanted to know further.

Above, for example. It was what I mean by not further mudding the water, as I come to same theory in my head, though I don't want to give you the idea of using it as an "excuse", to accidentally prompt you into the narrative. Now that you say it yourself, safe to say to say that the scenario in my mind is a possibility, namely you sell your phone and someone access BC with it.

I'll have to ask my contact what happened when a phone is factory resetted [as you'll logically do when you sell your phone], whether their system will read it as similar device or not. In the meantime though, do you mind to tell me [ballpark is fine] when did you sell your phone?

[...]"touch n go" response (don't know how to quote same thing all over again)

One account was never played with, other one was the active one, that's what I'm 100% positive. No deposits, no plays on that one account, no nothing. Which one was which, I can't fully state, as I used my phone number to login to the account I've used. Based on what they provided, it appears I used account that was created second time (based on UID).[...]

Now, I am confused. Maybe the best approach is to tell me how exactly you log-in to your BC account, every time you log into it? Because first, I thought you use email, then you use Google auto-sign-in, and now phone number. I don't want to be too quick to assume, so maybe you better retrace retold us your "daily activity" with BC?