Oh my god, you are dumber than I thought!

Is this what you are basing your argument on?

I don't think you’re fully getting how the court stuff played out here. You keep saying the court didn’t explicitly say bcgame has to pay op, but like... the bankruptcy ruling kind of says it all.

They don’t declare companies bankrupt just for fun, that ruling basically means the court agreed the player claims, including op’s, were legit.

I did some digging and found a couple sources:

NEXT.io article : https://next.io/news/regulation/bc-game-declared-bankrupt/
Title: BC.Game Declared Bankrupt Amid Unpaid Player Claims - says the curaçao court declared bcgame’s parent companies - small house bv and blockdance bv bankrupt over unpaid player claims. Mentions the lawsuit came from multiple players, op included for withheld winnings. Notes bcgame dipped out to belize/anjouan after the bankruptcy

Curaçao Chronicle article: https://www.curacaochronicle.com/post/main/curacao-court-declares-bankruptcy-for-blockdance-and-small-house-amidst-unpaid-player-claims/
Title: Curaçao Court Declares Bankruptcy for Blockdance and Small House Amid Unpaid Player Claims
This one straight up says the court ruled in favor of the players, also confirms bcgame owed over $2.1M, and yeah, it calls out the bankruptcy as a dodge to avoid paying up

So while it might not be in the form of a big bold “bcgame must pay op,” the rulings and articles make it super clear the claims were valid and the company was held accountable - at least on paper.