Quote from: gmaxwell on Today at 10:35:53 PM

It solved an immediate problem for them

It got "them" to Citrea. This is why Jameson Lopp attacked v3 too. (Lopp is a rathole investor in Citrea)

Surely this is apparent to you at this point as well?

I've been hooking up people with Testnet publicly with books since 2022, and suddenly it's a problem via a Lopp post? Then all this shit starts rolling. Roll Eyes

lol

Quote from: gmaxwell on Today at 10:35:53 PM

To be clear, no one cares whatever flavor of shitcoining you're interested in. If you want to eat peercoins topped with clam sauce or whatever, that's your own business. But bitcoin devs aren't interested in shitcoining, and aren't interested in maintaining software for shitcoins themselves, and just won't continue to use any testnet thing that has economic trade that makes testing cost money that ought to be free.

A pretty rich statement from someone spreading propaganda to assist the shitcoinery on Bitcoin. Tongue

(which I support)

Just to be clear as well, no one cares what you think a coin is made for. None of this is should be exclusive to what *you think you think* because the facts are showing a very different story. I'm no dev and many many moons ago, I attempted to start with Testnet, but Bitcoin was easier to get (LOL)... that memory has stuck with me.

Also, Testnet is and always have been free in small quantities. We support this. People having the options to spend a few shitcoins to get a few Testnet coins is none of your fucking business. (The bill, whoever hired them anyway, woohoo.)

Bitcoin Testnet is used by people and devs. I think to think differently at this point would be rather silly.

Also, Citrea requires 10 TBTC to test their stuff... where in ANY point of Testnets history would have have been achievable through a faucet? Please, enlighten me.