Quote from: gh0573d on Today at 06:55:29 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 06:34:55 PM

I know you stated it was your speculation, do you have any update with regards to this? If they have done something that calls the name of their business into disrepute it should be highlighted and should be discussed too.

Quote from: gh0573d on May 23, 2025, 07:23:19 PM

Actually, if I am reading everything correctly, BCgame might just provided fabricated evidence to holydarkness (this is only my speculation based on his wording after meeting with his contact).

Still just a speculation.

holy stated in one of his posts that it appears that what he seen from his contact was geniune/matching info. Still waiting for something concrete.

[I'm stepping off from my spectator chair and jump in, as my statement is kinda... needed here, I guess?]

Should be genuine.

I tried to pull some kind of double-blind-study [for a lack of better terms] where both BC and OP didn't know what I'm looking for. BC provided me with evidences that I later asked OP to retrace from his own side, and the narrative that OP told matched the evidence BC gave. They both shouldn't know what I'm looking for or why I'm asking specific things, and as both side give a matching chronology, I think it's safe to assume that the evidence BC gave to me is the same that BC gave to CG, and they're not tampered in a sense that they manipulate the elements to be in their favor.

I'm trying to pull yet another one, just now, on OP's other thread. We'll see if it'll further confirm that the evidences are genuine and matched OP's own narrative.