Scraped on 29/05/2025, 14:40:06 UTC
The whole story you're missing on BSV is that once the chain way beyond anyone's tolerance to sync anymore it was essentially controlled by a monopolist miner, Calvin Ayre the sponsor and co-conspirator of Wright, and they used their control to force hard fork consensus rule changes onto the system like "asset recovery" -- basically allowing themselves the ability to steal any coin on the system whenever they want.
So like, sure spam bad or whatever. But so what, who cares? There is a *reason* the bloat is bad-- and that's because users autonomy to reject rule changes depends on the ability to run a full node being a practical choice.
It's also why I'm not particularly concerned about spam in bitcoin-- because it can't have that kind of outcome (unless, of course, the spam promoters convince bitcoiners to eliminate the resource constraints).
Original archived Re: Satoshi Nakamoto may have intentionally slowed Bitcoin adoption early on.
Scraped on 29/05/2025, 14:35:14 UTC
The whole story you're missing on BSV is that once the chain way beyond anyone's tolerance to sync anymore it was essentially controlled by a monopolist miner, Calvin Ayre the sponsor and co-conspirator of Wright, and they used their control to force hard fork consensus rule changes onto the system like "asset recovery" -- basically allowing themselves the ability to steal any coin on the system whenever they want.
So like, sure spam bad or whatever. But so what, who cares? There is a *reason* the bloat is bad-- and that's because users autonomy to reject rule changes depends on the ability to run a full node being a practical choice.