Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Scraped on 29/05/2025, 17:34:24 UTC
I will quote you inline
The part I heard was the tariffs on sectors still exists and is not contested going forward but entire nations thats where its considered overreach.
All of this back and forth I consider temporary as basic trade requires a fair exchange or comparative advantage by both countries and that basic rule exists above any government attempts to control trade absolutely.
A few companies have pointed this out that less trade and less money will be made if trade is prevented in any way, its not helpful to hold back companies in USA from free action. The revenue of just one country is not the primary aim of such large companies who want and need global trade to truly suceed. The whole AI dynamic is so massive its clearly requiring a worldwide scale to do best and probably many other industries old and new imo.
Time and tide is bigger then us all in the end. While this president may never agree with those ideas, the general rule of money talks in future will have it come close to that ongoing trade required by all nations to thrive here or abroad.
Quote
Quote
The international court now as said Trump did not have the power to impose tariff on many countries
The part I heard was the tariffs on sectors still exists and is not contested going forward but entire nations thats where its considered overreach.
All of this back and forth I consider temporary as basic trade requires a fair exchange or comparative advantage by both countries and that basic rule exists above any government attempts to control trade absolutely.
A few companies have pointed this out that less trade and less money will be made if trade is prevented in any way, its not helpful to hold back companies in USA from free action.
Time and tide is bigger then us all in the end. While this president may never agree with those ideas, the general rule of money talks in future will have it come close to that ongoing trade required by all nations to thrive here or abroad.
Version 1
Scraped on 29/05/2025, 17:09:10 UTC
Quote
Quote
The international court now as said Trump did not have the power to impose tariff on many countries
The part I heard was the tariffs on sectors still exists and is not contested going forward but entire nations thats where its considered overreach.
All of this back and forth I consider temporary as basic trade requires a fair exchange or comparative advantage by both countries and that basic rule exists above any government attempts to control trade absolutely.
A few companies have pointed this out that less trade and less money will be made if trade is prevented in any way, its not helpful to hold back companies in USA from free action. The revenue of just one country is not the primary aim of such large companies who want and need global trade to truly suceed. The whole AI dynamic is so massive its clearly requiring a worldwide scale to do best and probably many other industries old and new imo.
While this president may never agree with those ideas, the general rule of money talks in future will have it come close to that ongoing trade required by all nations to thrive here or abroad.
Original archived Re: US trade court rules Trump overstepped his authority with global tariffs
Scraped on 29/05/2025, 17:04:27 UTC
I will quote you inline
The part I heard was the tariffs on sectors still exists and is not contested going forward but entire nations thats where its considered overreach.
All of this back and forth I consider temporary as basic trade requires a fair exchange or comparative advantage by both countries and that basic rule exists above any government attempts to control trade absolutely. A few companies have pointed this out that less trade and less money will be made if trade is prevented in any way, its not helpful to hold back companies in USA. While this president may never agree with those ideas, the general rule of money talks will have it come close to that ongoing trade required by all nations to thrive here or abroad.
Quote
The international court now as said Trump did not have the power to impose tariff on many countries
The part I heard was the tariffs on sectors still exists and is not contested going forward but entire nations thats where its considered overreach.
All of this back and forth I consider temporary as basic trade requires a fair exchange or comparative advantage by both countries and that basic rule exists above any government attempts to control trade absolutely. A few companies have pointed this out that less trade and less money will be made if trade is prevented in any way, its not helpful to hold back companies in USA. While this president may never agree with those ideas, the general rule of money talks will have it come close to that ongoing trade required by all nations to thrive here or abroad.