This is an interesting scam accusation against Betfury. The fact that you have decided to stand your ground and are trying to get the correct payout, deserves respect. $100,000 is a phenomenal amount of money to turn down but there is no reason why you should accept it if Betfury owe you $300,000.
I didn't inquire about the details, but the $100k wasn't offered as cash, but as a bonus, likely with very unfavorable terms."Would win" is not guaranteed. One wrong result could lose you the whole betslip.
These are the amounts the bets did win. There are no hypotethicals.Quote
Since it was cancelled before the event finished, their ground is absolutely right and valid. A bookmaker can even void a betslip after the result if they think there were something wrong happened in the match or in your account [In that case we could ask for data].
They didn't cancel a bet with a single event, they canceled multis where several bets already won. In some cases the bets had already won 3/4 legs (check screenshots).There's nothing wrong or suspicious of my bets, again have a look at them. They are all major leagues in Europe and the US. They also haven't claimed that I personally did anything wrong, only that i was "high risk".
Quote
They were generous to you. Since you refused then the case is closed. Why are you even complaining?
lolzLOL, what is this nonsense reply, honestly. Generous, haha. What should he be grateful for? That he got his wager back? Once a site accepts a bet they should honor it, plain and simple. A player doesn't have the chance to cancel a bet, even when he made a mistake in for example choosing the wrong wager amount or something. Nothing was wrong with the games he bet on. Also, there were games in his parley that already won, don't you get that? So they cancelled winning bets.
Sometimes it's better to post nothing instead of just posting absolute nonsense.
Exactly.Sometimes it's better to post nothing instead of just posting absolute nonsense.
Were there any wagering requirements as well?
We didn't get into specifics, but I'm sure that was the case.Quote
Casinos behave like omnipotent beings with this rule. This is unfair on the part of the casino to not honor bets just because they think it is not suitable for their bankroll (high risk). The casino should not have accepted the bets in the first place. This will not look good on the reputation profile of Betfury which might deter some high rollers. They must pay the entire amount or the cashout value of those bets at that time.
They can have whatever they want in the fine print, but once they pull something like this there's no reason for any informed player to give them any action. There are plenty of legit casinos/sportsbooks, whether of the highly regulated country-local variety or these loosely regulated global crypto ones that would never shaft a player in this way. In the end they are all based on reputation, so they are taking a hit from this situation one way or the other.