Next scheduled rescrape ... in 4 days
Version 2
Last scraped
Scraped on 02/06/2025, 20:05:11 UTC
Strategy should be pressured into doing the same by the bitcoin community.
If I was a shareholder I would start a pressure campaign up to and including a class action lawsuit
if they don't comply. A public company should not be concealing such critical information from their
shareholders.

Who knows if all the shareholders has the central bitcoin address but instructed to not show it the public,

I seriously doubt that. There are thousands of Strategy shareholders. If they all knew the public address
of the bitcoins it would be very easy for any of them to anonymously leak the information onto the internet, and many
would have done so by now, and it would be impossible to stop. So there is no point asking anyone to keep it a secret.

i dont see any reasons or implication for strategy to publicize their bitcoin address, whats the need, so what can the public do after seeing it, what benefits?


No reason? It's called proof of reserves. How else do you know they possess the bitcoinsassets they say they do
without verifiable proof? You're just going to take their word for it? Are you really that gullible?

The bitcoin ethos is that you should never trust, but verify. Saylor said so himself many times when explaining to people what bitcoin is.
But he doesn't seem to practice what he preaches. A Bitcoiner should always question everything and never trust anyone's word for anything
without fully vetting their claims. NeverDon't take anything for granted. That's not just a bitcoin thing, it's just simple common sense and
good business practice for anything in life. Bitcoin was created so you don't have to trust anyone, you can verify for yourself on the network.

Version 1
Scraped on 02/06/2025, 19:40:17 UTC
Strategy should be pressured into doing the same by the bitcoin community.
If I was a shareholder I would start a pressure campaign up to and including a class action lawsuit
if they don't comply. A public company should not be concealing such critical information from their
shareholders.

Who knows if all the shareholders has the central bitcoin address but instructed to not show it the public,

I seriously doubt that. There are thousands of Strategy shareholders. If they all knew the public address
of the bitcoins it would be very easy for any of them to anonymously leak the information onto the internet, and many
would have done so by now, and it would be impossible to stop them. So there is no point asking anyone to telling them to keep it a secret.

i dont see any reasons or implication for strategy to publicize their bitcoin address, whats the need, so what can the public do after seeing it, what benefits?


No reason? It's called proof of reserves. How else do you know they possess the bitcoins they say they do
without verifiable proof? You're just going to take their word for it? Are you really that gullible?

The bitcoin ethos is that you should never trust, but verify. Saylor said so himself many timetimes when explaining to people what bitcoin is.
But he doesn't seem to practice what he preaches. A Bitcoiner should always question everything and never take rusttrust anyone's word
without verifyingfully vetting their claims. Never take anything for granted. That's not just a bitcoin thing, it's just simple common sense and
good business practice for anything in life. Bitcoin was created so you don't have to trust anyone, you can verify for yourself on the network.

Original archived Re: Strategy's Bitcoin holdings now are tracked on Arkham.
Scraped on 02/06/2025, 19:35:11 UTC
Strategy should be pressured into doing the same by the bitcoin community.
If I was a shareholder I would start a pressure campaign up to and including a class action lawsuit
if they don't comply. A public company should not be concealing such critical information from their
shareholders.

Who knows if all the shareholders has the central bitcoin address but instructed to not show it the public,

I seriously doubt that. There are thousands of Strategy shareholders. If they all knew the public address
of the bitcoins it would be very easy for any of them to anonymously leak the information onto the internet, and many
would have done so by now, and it would be impossible to stop them. So there is no point to telling them to keep it a secret.

i dont see any reasons or implication for strategy to publicize their bitcoin address, whats the need, so what can the public do after seeing it, what benefits?


No reason? It's called proof of reserves. How else do you know they possess the bitcoins they say they do
without verifiable proof? You're just going to take their word for it? Are you really that gullible?

The bitcoin ethos is that you should never trust, but verify. Saylor said so himself many time when explaining what bitcoin is.
But he doesn't seem to practice what he preaches. A Bitcoiner should always question everything and never take rust anyone's word
without verifying their claims. Never take anything for granted. That's not just a bitcoin thing, it's just simple common sense and
good business practice for anything in life.