Edited on 10/06/2025, 06:43:59 UTC
In the first 250 hands there is exactly *one* 3bet pre between the accused colluders. That hand both players had AK and got it in pre after the others folded to chop. The bet sizes post also seem to be smaller vs each other than vs the marks. I think there is enough to say they are at the very least soft playing each other and card sharing. Obv SwC has all the hole cards and i would expect there to be some very damning hands. Too many coincidences for me.
Well done SwC.
edit - time stamps are interesting. After taking almost 2 minutes to play the first hand, they play the next 40 in 21 minutes. That is ridiculously fast for a high stakes table. In 40 hands there don't seem to be *any* decisions that require any extended thinking. More indirect evidence that it's all just one person.
Original archived Re: SWC Poker - it's a SCAM / My review and true story
Scraped on 03/06/2025, 06:44:14 UTC
In the first 250 hands there is exactly *one* 3bet pre between the accused colluders. That hand both players had AK and got it in pre after the others folded to chop. The bet sizes post also seem to be smaller vs each other than vs the marks. I think there is enough to say they are at the very least soft playing each other and card sharing. Obv SwC has all the hole cards and i would expect there to be some very damning hands. Too many coincidences for me.
Well done SwC.