Quote from: Blossom15 on Today at 04:18:24 PM

Quote from: gh0573d on Today at 09:51:05 AM

Considering holydarkness conclusion, which is against me (we'll wait for him to provide the evidence), it is time to throw more data into equation.

My issue with all of this is how bc has stayed completely silent. Not a single word from them. Does holydarkness speak for them now? If they can share evidence with him, they should at least be able to come on here and clarify that.

Yes, it's highly likely that bc.game have employed holydarkness to handle their PR for them, based on this trust rating left from bc.game to holydarkness in the past (removed since being pointed out ironically):

holydarkness doesn't explicitly deny that he is not incentivized or remunerated in any way though with the level of involvement he has specifically in bc.game's cases, it's quite reasonable to say that it's highly likely that holydarkness is employed by bc.game.