Quote from: JollyGood on May 30, 2025, 10:12:10 AM

I think the vast majority that have an interest in these threads would probably disagree with your comments about the public relations. In the end, if a member does not agree with a point of view does not necessarily mean they are corrupt. I think these types of allegations do not help the situation especially when someone is claiming they were a victim of a scam.

Quote from: BenCodie on May 30, 2025, 03:34:33 AM

Quote from: holydarkness on May 29, 2025, 04:42:40 PM

My opinion on this topic? I can't say yet, as this thread is designed by OP to address the matters surrounding BC globally. I am yet to touch any aspect pointed in this thread as I'm currently chasing OP's other thread that focused on and limited to his own case with BC. I think I'm very close with the bottom of that thread, just waiting for some posts and reply from both sides as I'm currently doing another double-blind test on them.

I'll move to this thread once I managed to deliver my final findings on the other thread.

You can't say because you are doing their public relations for them.

The unbiased opinion that bc.game is a fraudulent casino that is using sophisticated legal tactics to scam unsuspecting players and to escape any legal prosecution, and are taking advantage of players who do not create a scam accusation thread in this forum, is growing. BC.game's time is limited.

I tried to tell you that you are wrapped up in helping a fraudulent casino and yet you continue to be a "free" PR rep for them. Though, I still maintain my opinion that you receive some for of favoring or compensation for work, considering you refuse to explicitly deny that you benefit in any way whatsoever for acting on their behalf as a PR rep. I can't possibly believe that someone who is dealing with so many cases for free (apparently) doesn't stop and think "Oh gee, I what about all the people who aren't making threads about their accounts being frozen?" or "Am I protecting the reputation of criminals/scammers?". Have you ever stopped and thought that, and if so, what were your thoughts and actions after that?

Here is the trust rating that bc.game left on holydarkness' profile before it was removed:

Making invaluable contributions to the brand's reputation through handling their disputes for them, is handling their public relations for them, wouldn't you agree? This is the perspective of bc.game themselves.

Quote from: holydarkness on May 30, 2025, 05:40:50 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on May 30, 2025, 03:34:33 AM

Quote from: holydarkness on May 29, 2025, 04:42:40 PM

My opinion on this topic? I can't say yet, as this thread is designed by OP to address the matters surrounding BC globally. I am yet to touch any aspect pointed in this thread as I'm currently chasing OP's other thread that focused on and limited to his own case with BC. I think I'm very close with the bottom of that thread, just waiting for some posts and reply from both sides as I'm currently doing another double-blind test on them.

I'll move to this thread once I managed to deliver my final findings on the other thread.

You can't say because you are doing their public relations for them.

The unbiased opinion that bc.game is a fraudulent casino that is using sophisticated legal tactics to scam unsuspecting players and to escape any legal prosecution, and are taking advantage of players who do not create a scam accusation thread in this forum, is growing. BC.game's time is limited.

I tried to tell you that you are wrapped up in helping a fraudulent casino and yet you continue to be a "free" PR rep for them. Though, I still maintain my opinion that you receive some for of favoring or compensation for work, considering you refuse to explicitly deny that you benefit in any way whatsoever for acting on their behalf as a PR rep. I can't possibly believe that someone who is dealing with so many cases for free (apparently) doesn't stop and think "Oh gee, I what about all the people who aren't making threads about their accounts being frozen?" or "Am I protecting the reputation of criminals/scammers?". Have you ever stopped and thought that, and if so, what were your thoughts and actions after that?

I'm giving my best to ignore you as you derail cases, but... are we doing this dance again?

I've made my statement, it's quite clear and enough for people who simply looking for confirmation instead of throwing muds. Since that statement is not satisfying enough for you, it infers that you're... but hey, my offer still stands, I'll copy-paste exactly what you want me to say, just put your money where your mouth is... or rather your fingers.

Can't help but notice that this thread must be a goldmine to you, though. If I can help the player, you'll gleefully said, "Look, BC paid because they're cornered. If OP never create his thread, BC will run with his money." If I can't get OP to get his fund though, it'll be "See? holydarkness is covering for BC". Such a win-win scenario for someone with dysfunctional spine.

But hey, here's a little wake up call: by saying that casinos are selectively scamming their player with methods you proposed: where they'll steal from people who didn't raise complaints in this forum, you do aware that the scenario also applied to literally every casino on this forum, right? Including the one which signature you're wearing, and pay you?

Were you also accusing me of getting incentive from BetFury for [I believe the word you use here is:] "bridging" between the player and them? Are they also selectively scamming their player and collecting wealth from those who can't sound their protest here? Yet you're still happily wear their sig and receive payments?

Or were they an exception from your understanding of how casinos steal from their players simply because you're wearing their sig?

What ethic is that? Ohh right, you have an entire, no wait, two entire... umm three, discussion with 1miau.

Hhhhh... this is a case of naivette at best and hypocrisy at worst. But yep... put your money where your mouth and fingers are, next time you mention my name and accuse me with those things, it better come with that deal I offer you. Otherwise just shushh, you're just further embarrassing yourself by showing how severe the dysfuctionality of your back is. My two cents though.

OP, sorry, just venting up to my annoyance of one specific bug that keep circling me. You, above all, certainly knows how many pages I read and the length I take to get your case done, and now imagine those effort meet with such post like quoted, just because the person is so morally and ethically challenged that he can't believe people are doing things out of good will. Wait... let's trace it further... the comment was initially birthed because he had a dislike with a CM of BC, I believe, and I'm a collateral victim here that he dragged into the mud just to further his agenda. This post has nothing to do with you, don't mind it.

It's already clear to many that bc.game only resolve cases that are posted on this forum to both protect their reputation here and likely because when "bc.game scam" is searched, only resolved cases are shown (creating the guise that bc.game is legitimate). It's already clear that you handle PR for them and other casinos, most likely for a reward from somewhere (direct or indirect) and that it isn't done for free (despite the word magic you continue to use around the topic).

You can keep dragging me into the conversation and wasting your time with your words, call me dysfunctional, write word walls to try and tarnish what my words mean, and so on, though it means very little to me. The truth is (no matter what you say about or to me) is that you are a part of keeping the bc.game scam machine alive, as well as other casinos here.

Quote from: gh0573d on June 01, 2025, 07:42:33 AM

I've asked AI: "I want to play on BC.game. Should I trust it?" (please note although I highly believe that AI are giving you reasonable doubt, they can still throw "delusional" answers):

It should be noted too that (depending on if you are using chatgpt for free or not) it's knowledge may not be up to the current date.