Edited on 11/06/2025, 06:23:58 UTC
We can argue sports betting is about knowledge a person has about sports but at the end of the day, a person who merely goes with favorite, will also get his picks often right. So is sports betting actually about knowledge?
Edit: So many people are misunderstanding the word, 'favorite' here. What I meant here is oddmaker's favorite. Suppose, a competition is held between two teams 'A' and 'B' with odds 1.2 for former and 2.0 for latter, then former is favorite, and bettor can bet on this favorite without having iota of knowledge about sports itself and still likely win the bet.
I understand the payout will be less, but here we are saying, getting the pick right without having knowledge about sports whatsoever.
Hope I have made myself clear enough.
Original archived Knowledgeable sports bettor vs bettor merely going with favorite
Scraped on 04/06/2025, 06:24:14 UTC
We can argue sports betting is about knowledge a person has about sports but at the end of the day, a person who merely goes with favorite, will also get his picks often right. So is sports betting actually about knowledge?