Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Edited on 11/06/2025, 19:00:49 UTC
~
~
You are simply trying to confuse the issue, as always. Even if the things you say about the START Treaty are true, the point is the same as always. Russia is winning on the ground, and has the capability to do much more damage.
I don't think that Russia will be forced to destroy the European NATO countries. They will capitulate to the overwhelmingly superior strength of the Russian military before Russia has to do this. Of course, Zelensky will be gone before this happens... except that he is taken captive in Russia's taking of Kiev and all of Ukraine.
Nope, there is no confusion. You said Ukraine had broken the START treaty, but that is not true. Ruzzia suspended his participation that treaty.
If Ruzzia feels there is something to gain by using nuclear power, they will use it. The reason why they have and will not is because there is nothing to gain from it, and most likely would turn China into an enemy - and probably force a NATO intervention.
Essentially everything that Ukraine does in this war is terrorism. Why? Because Ukraine doesn't have any strength of its own. The only reason why it has the appearance of strength is that there is NATO military in there.
Russia didn't back out of parts of the START Treaty for nothing. It backed out because the West had already broken the Treaty many times over, even though it tried to hide its breaking of the Treaty in the Ukraine conflict.
Any country with nukes will use them if they feel that there is something worthwhile to gain from using them. What's the use of having nukes as a deterrent if there isn't the promise of using them when necessary?
Currently, Russia and China are
Meanwhile, there is war brewing in the Baltic Sea, because the West has said that Russian ships are using the Baltic illegally, against the sanctions. Russia is moving its military there to protect the ships. It's the West that is illegally declaring Russian activity to be illegal, and then acting on their illegal declarations. International waters are for use by everybody, not only the West. The West is illegal in its attacks on Russian ships in International waters.
Meanwhile, Russia is overcoming Ukraine militarily all along the line of fighting at the Black Sea Corridor. Certainly, Russia is sustaining some damage in their push. But, they are essentially pushing Ukraine out.
Version 1
Scraped on 04/06/2025, 19:05:49 UTC
~
~
You are simply trying to confuse the issue, as always. Even if the things you say about the START Treaty are true, the point is the same as always. Russia is winning on the ground, and has the capability to do much more damage.
I don't think that Russia will be forced to destroy the European NATO countries. They will capitulate to the overwhelmingly superior strength of the Russian military before Russia has to do this. Of course, Zelensky will be gone before this happens... except that he is taken captive in Russia's taking of Kiev and all of Ukraine.
Nope, there is no confusion. You said Ukraine had broken the START treaty, but that is not true. Ruzzia suspended his participation that treaty.
If Ruzzia feels there is something to gain by using nuclear power, they will use it. The reason why they have and will not is because there is nothing to gain from it, and most likely would turn China into an enemy - and probably force a NATO intervention.
Essentially everything that Ukraine does in this war is terrorism. Why? Because Ukraine doesn't have any strength of its own. The only reason why it has the appearance of strength is that there is NATO military in there.
Russia didn't back out of parts of the START Treaty for nothing. It backed out because the West had already broken the Treaty many times over, even though it tried to hide its breaking of the Treaty in the Ukraine conflict.
Any country with nukes will use them if they feel that there is something worthwhile to gain from using them. What's the use of having nukes as a deterrent if there isn't the promise of using them when necessary
Currently, Russia and China are in essentially in joint military activity. Russia is training China is some of its military prowess.
Meanwhile, there is war brewing in the Baltic Sea, because the West has said that Russian ships are using the Baltic illegally, against the sanctions. Russia is moving its military there to protect the ships. It's the West that is illegally declaring Russian activity to be illegal, and then acting on their illegal declarations. International waters are for use by everybody, not only the West. The West is illegal in its attacks on Russian ships in International waters.
Meanwhile, Russia is overcoming Ukraine militarily all along the line of fighting at the Black Sea Corridor. Certainly, Russia is sustaining some damage in their push. But, they are essentially pushing Ukraine out.
Original archived Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress]
Scraped on 04/06/2025, 19:00:54 UTC
~
~
You are simply trying to confuse the issue, as always. Even if the things you say about the START Treaty are true, the point is the same as always. Russia is winning on the ground, and has the capability to do much more damage.
I don't think that Russia will be forced to destroy the European NATO countries. They will capitulate to the overwhelmingly superior strength of the Russian military before Russia has to do this. Of course, Zelensky will be gone before this happens... except that he is taken captive in Russia's taking of Kiev and all of Ukraine.
Nope, there is no confusion. You said Ukraine had broken the START treaty, but that is not true. Ruzzia suspended his participation that treaty.
If Ruzzia feels there is something to gain by using nuclear power, they will use it. The reason why they have and will not is because there is nothing to gain from it, and most likely would turn China into an enemy - and probably force a NATO intervention.
Essentially everything that Ukraine does in this war is terrorism. Why? Because Ukraine doesn't have any strength of its own. The only reason why it has the appearance of strength is that there is NATO military in there.
Russia didn't back out of parts of the START Treaty for nothing. It backed out because the West had already broken the Treaty many times over, even though it tried to hide its breaking of the Treaty in the Ukraine conflict.
Any country with nukes will use them if they feel that there is something worthwhile to gain from using them. What's the use of having nukes as a deterrent if there isn't the promise of using them when necessary.
Currently, Russia and China are in essentially in joint military activity. Russia is training China is some of its military prowess.
Meanwhile, there is war brewing in the Baltic Sea, because the West has said that Russian ships are using the Baltic illegally, against the sanctions. Russia is moving its military there to protect the ships. It's the West that is illegally declaring Russian activity to be illegal, and then acting on their illegal declarations. International waters are for use by everybody, not only the West. The West is illegal in its attacks on Russian ships in International waters.
Meanwhile, Russia is overcoming Ukraine militarily all along the line of fighting at the Black Sea Corridor. Certainly, Russia is sustaining some damage in their push. But, they are essentially pushing Ukraine out.