Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Scraped on 12/06/2025, 12:42:22 UTC
I looked through all the hands on an Excel sheet and tallied them by hand, so my numbers perhaps weren't exact, but neither are these:

Model analyzed all hands for about 10minutes with a script in python.
I got this result :

Went to River / Went to Showdown
gd1990 vs caroline93     30   17
gd1990 vs MichaelDE    39   23
MichaelDE vs caroline93   18   11

Original output in a readable format :


GPT also created a file for me where only the hands are.
https://paste.ee/p/U4ZTnKlG

We don't like AI because it frequently produces false information, which is what happened here. For example, the numbers you provided in the screenshot don't match the numbers in your paste.ee file. This is what the file says:

gd1990 vs caroline93 - Went to Showdown (Total 8 )
gd1990 vs MichaelDE - Went to Showdown (Total 14)
MichaelDE vs caroline93 - Went to Showdown (Total 2)

Also, I was just counting hands when it was only 2 of the 3 players suspected of collusion involved. When you take the hands with other players out:

gd1990 vs caroline93 - 6
gd1990 vs MichaelDE - 12
MichaelDE vs caroline93 - 1

So I was only off by +2 total. And again, not a single showdown in the first 43 hands while these 3 players were playing against each other. That in itself is quite odd, statistically speaking.
Version 1
Scraped on 05/06/2025, 12:47:20 UTC
I looked through all the hands on an Excel sheet and tallied them by hand, so my numbers perhaps weren't exact, but neither are these:

Model analyzed all hands for about 10minutes with a script in python.
I got this result :

Went to River / Went to Showdown
gd1990 vs caroline93     30   17
gd1990 vs MichaelDE    39   23
MichaelDE vs caroline93   18   11

Original output in a readable format :


GPT also created a file for me where only the hands are.
https://paste.ee/p/U4ZTnKlG

We don't like AI here because it frequently produces false information, which is what happened here. For example, the numbers you provided in the screenshot don't match the numbers in your paste.ee file. This is what the file says:

gd1990 vs caroline93 - Went to Showdown (Total Cool 8 )
gd1990 vs MichaelDE - Went to Showdown (Total 14)
MichaelDE vs caroline93 - Went to Showdown (Total 2)

Also, I was just counting hands when it was only 2 of the 3 players suspected of collusion involved. When you take the hands with other players out:

gd1990 vs caroline93 - 6
gd1990 vs MichaelDE - 12
MichaelDE vs caroline93 - 1

So I was only off by +2 total. And again, not a single showdown in the first 43 hands while these 3 players were playing against each other. That in itself is quite odd, statistically speaking.
Original archived Re: SWC Poker - it's a SCAM / My review and true story
Scraped on 05/06/2025, 12:42:20 UTC
I looked through all the hands on an Excel sheet and tallied them by hand, so my numbers perhaps weren't exact, but neither are these:

Model analyzed all hands for about 10minutes with a script in python.
I got this result :

Went to River / Went to Showdown
gd1990 vs caroline93     30   17
gd1990 vs MichaelDE    39   23
MichaelDE vs caroline93   18   11

Original output in a readable format :


GPT also created a file for me where only the hands are.
https://paste.ee/p/U4ZTnKlG

We don't like AI here because it frequently produces false information, which is what happened here. For example, the numbers you provided in the screenshot don't match the numbers in your paste.ee file. This is what the file says:

gd1990 vs caroline93 - Went to Showdown (Total Cool
gd1990 vs MichaelDE - Went to Showdown (Total 14)
MichaelDE vs caroline93 - Went to Showdown (Total 2)

Also, I was just counting hands when it was only 2 of the 3 players suspected of collusion involved. When you take the hands with other players out:

gd1990 vs caroline93 - 6
gd1990 vs MichaelDE - 12
MichaelDE vs caroline93 - 1

So I was only off by +2 total. And again, not a single showdown in the first 43 hands while these 3 players were playing against each other. That in itself is quite odd, statistically speaking.