Let’s break this down:
🔹 BTC is up massively over the long term, but often correlates with risk-on assets in short-term macro events
🔹 During periods of high inflation (2021–2022), Bitcoin fell alongside equities, raising doubts about its “hedge” status
A long term view on Bitcoin will render these first two points redundant. Its easy to
focus on and short term event in Bitcoins market and be ultra positive or negative about it.
Let’s break this down:
🔹 Institutional adoption is growing — ETFs, balance sheet exposure, sovereign interest — but are they treating BTC as a hedge or just a speculative growth play?
I would like to think they are treating Bitcoin as a hedge because everyone
is aware of the problems created with FIAT by lets say institutions.
🔹 With its fixed 21M supply and predictable issuance, Bitcoin should behave like hard money… but the volatility tells another story
Why does it have to act like hard money when everything about it is DIFFERENT?
Fixed supply
predictable issuance
Can BTC realistically serve as a safe-haven or inflation hedge in its current form — or is that only possible after further adoption and reduced volatility?
"realistically" - well it has proven to this point that it is a safe haven, the core principals
of it havent changed so we expect it will CONTINUE to be a safe haven.
Let’s challenge the thesis and unpack what it means for Bitcoin's future role in global finance 🧠
Challenge what thesis? challenge its proven performance?
It seems like you doubt Bitcoins future let alone its role in global finance