Re: ⚠️SCAM⚠️ BC.game - refusing to pay $1.5m, switched jurisdiction to avoid paying
[...]
Man's got a point there. This whole story went into a strange direction while basically everybody in this forum ignores all the basic facts about BC that are out in the open. I mentioned the bankrupt declaration already 6 months ago when it happened, yet nobody believed it or said it's fud, same old bitcointalk. BC is collecting positive feedback with their countless 25-50$ giveaways, that's how easy you can buy a positive image here, very sad. This site is the worst large and yet well received casino on the forum, and they prove it day in and day out.
A point that... I try to assassinate his character and do a corporate damage control by discussing what I found [in my idle time] and later cease completely from discussing it upon confirmation, as well as from my final findings as I found it irrelevant to the case?
Did I mention your name? No I didn't.
But now that you bring it up. Yes, you investigating the private person and not the player is a move that shouldn't have been brought up in the first place. You shouldn't be so eager to defend BC. What OP does in his private life doesn't have anything to do with BC. They thankfully took his deposits, didn't they. But once a player wins there is suddenly an issue with him? It was the same with the guy that got paid 7 million or whatever it was, back when BC still had some money to pay. They only paid him because they were assured he would deposit a big chunk back and continue playing, the player himself told me that. In return they would get a nice reputation boost.
Yet here BC got praised they paid him. Praised for what I wonder, for paying a rightful winner the money he won? Guess he should be thankful they paid him.
Now that money is more tight obviously paying out wins gets more tricky.
You should stay more unbiased. In the past weeks/months it looks a bit off. While you did a nice job in the beginning what you do now really changed from your first approach. Just my personal observation.
"corporate damage control" basically says it all, doesn't it. A mediator wouldn't use those words.
Ok, so maybe this is the pain I'm currently in and my meds talking, but fuck all these.
My findings, that I compiled from statements and evidences provided by both parties indicated that there are foul play by OP. There are evidences that I can't show, but clearly indicates that OP did mult-accounting [same emails, connected accounts, etc.]. I believe these evidences were also what become the basis of findings by CG and become CG's verdict. In spite of all of that, I still tried an approach that'll work best for OP, behind the screen, in the night before I have my second surgery, the hours before I entered the OR, and the hours after that, soon after I am able to move my body.
I literally tried every single attempt I can to get OP a happy ending, despite the findings. I am here simply to mediate, that's what I do and I always do for many cases. For OP though, I go to a length to get BC to overturn their decision regardless of the evidences I saw myself. I'll stress this again not to look for sympathy but to show how invested I am at this matter: I do all of those, after weeks of reading court ruling and documents and piecing puzzles given by every side, and still crossing the line by trying to get further, literally when I am about to be split open, and continue right after I got split open?
Yet I am killing OP's character and defending BC?
OP can substantiate my statements above with the exchange of PM we have. gh0573d, I give you my blessings to show them the extent I am pursuing to get you a happy ending and deescalate the matter. Unless you gave me your permission yourself and I can show the public myself the extend of this "biased" "bridge" who "defended BC" to get you a way out. Talking about character assassination.