From what we discussed and what was said, I can confirm that holydarkness attempted to initiate settlement privately, even though he seen evidence of me being "in wrong", as an idea of his based on my previous attempts to do such thing and my willingness to finally close this chapter of life, as it becomes really exhausting. While appreciated, I never received any response to offers I presented through him, even though I believe they were more than generous and actually beneficial only to BCGame, knowing that I never did something wrong.

As for permission @holydarkness, as I said privately, it is up to you whether or not to post it publicly, so you're free to do just that.

Now, I am going to throw something else out, which I was not willing to do because it would put a bad image.

Unfortunately @holydarkness, I have to agree with sentiment people are giving out to you here, although I would LOVE not to. To rewind this whole situation, lets start from a beginning of my case.

When I initiated post several times and privately passed you documentation in regards to the legal case in Curacao (bankruptcy ruling, my demand letter and other documentation), you have clearly ignored the fact that the ruling was based on cases brought by us (claimants) against BC.game and it was nowhere said that they should pay us. Last part, you are partially true, because I was unable to disclose such documentation to someone, but you were wrong that bankruptcy wasn't because of our claims.

I clearly showed it was.

On another note, I brought up in this thread several publications in regards to that bankruptcy, and you were persisting that we stay "on my case", even though it was related to my case directly. But I followed and created separate thread in [Reputation] forum section just not to keep mud in water.

After all said and done to keep this thread focused on my case, you brought up my history (which I won't defend, because it is mostly true) in the attempt to discredit anything that I am posting and give reasonable doubt to others. Which is (imho) irrelevant to case.

Further down your investigation, and according to your "findings" (even privately) you have ensured me and everyone else that BC.game has case of me so strong that I can't win it (based on what you've seen of course, I don't want to say you did anything wrong).

Now, let me present to the public their defense evidence in case against me sent back in September 13, 2024:





I am simply going to ask several questions which I already raised countless times over the course of few weeks of having this thread open:

1 - If they did had such an evidence in the very beginning, why wouldn't they provide it and basically kill this case from a very get-go?
2 - Or even better, knowing that they might be declared bankrupt and having all that evidence against me and other players, why wouldn't they open up bank account in Curacao (where they were licensed at a time), deposit amount of claims and fight it in court?
3 - Why wouldn't they provided such evidence before this case even went to court, aka response to my demand letter, or even before when I was the one initiating conversation in attempt to figure out the actual reason?
4 - Image provided in the evidence is blurred, yet there is a clear picture showing that two out of 3 accounts "linking" to me are banned, yet third one is not? Why would that be so?
5 - One better, why would they hide the other two accounts which I still claim were mine while one of those two was unwillingly and unknowingly created because of the technical error (bug)?

These are the questions I already asked like several times, to which you nor them could ever answer to me.

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your help in trying to resolve this matter to the point where you helped me build even stronger case against them and pursue it even further, but bias towards BC.game exists.

To be perfectly transparent with the others (and so to say hypocrite), I was willing to settle for 1/3rd of the claim, or even 1/2 of it with clause that would keep my mouth shut and take the blame for something I didn't do. I was hypocrite but this case really started to burn my time and money is something I need right now, so I was willing to throw my name even deeper down the drain just to get this finally closed.

I was wrong. Now after proving to what lengths they are ready to AVOID (not fight, but avoid) legal repercussions, I would really be laughing if you or anyone else would tell me that I was in wrong from a very beginning - they are scums, criminals.


@AHOY - Well, I see the problem, but that's something nobody's unable to control, and is kinda sad. Signature ad campaign along with constant bonuses does buy the reputation here. Although this is a free speech forum, I don't think that distancing itself as being one from the obvious scams should be a way to go. Especially since it's directly effecting its users. I am new and should not be a judge to it, especially since I am far from being clean guy, but at least some involvement should be taken here for other users.

---

Let me throw an addition to my question number 3:

Lets say they thought "it was nothing serious at a start" and just thrown basic image and few words on it, while they were having that ironclad evidence. Why then, at bankruptcy appeal they haven't provided that ironclad evidence against me? Instead, here's what is being provided:






- First two images, they are defending legitimacy of my claims against Small House BV by throwing git history.
- Third is confidential agreement, but it's basically a lousy attempt to prove they indeed sold company and that Blockdance BV was liable for my winnings. Disclaimer: My winnings happened post-acquisition (if there was any), in between May and June.
- Fourth image is their attempt at "attack is best defense", in which they claim I owe them $65k because I won that money aka was in NET positive? And I am not the only one. Second player got same demand letter for over $200k because he was in NET positive.


None of the evidence you or anyone else have seen were ever presented to the court. That's why there is really hard time BCgame, CG or you could persuade me otherwise. If I ever did something wrong and they've had evidence, it should've been known in court and bankruptcy would never happen.

From what we discussed and what was said, I can confirm that holydarkness attempted to initiate settlement privately, even though he seen evidence of me being "in wrong", as an idea of his based on my previous attempts to do such thing and my willingness to finally close this chapter of life, as it becomes really exhausting. While appreciated, I never received any response to offers I presented through him, even though I believe they were more than generous and actually beneficial only to BCGame, knowing that I never did something wrong.

As for permission @holydarkness, as I said privately, it is up to you whether or not to post it publicly, so you're free to do just that.

Now, I am going to throw something else out, which I was not willing to do because it would put a bad image.

Unfortunately @holydarkness, I have to agree with sentiment people are giving out to you here, although I would LOVE not to. To rewind this whole situation, lets start from a beginning of my case.

When I initiated post several times and privately passed you documentation in regards to the legal case in Curacao (bankruptcy ruling, my demand letter and other documentation), you have clearly ignored the fact that the ruling was based on cases brought by us (claimants) against BC.game and it was nowhere said that they should pay us. Last part, you are partially true, because I was unable to disclose such documentation to someone, but you were wrong that bankruptcy wasn't because of our claims.

I clearly showed it was.

On another note, I brought up in this thread several publications in regards to that bankruptcy, and you were persisting that we stay "on my case", even though it was related to my case directly. But I followed and created separate thread in [Reputation] forum section just not to keep mud in water.

After all said and done to keep this thread focused on my case, you brought up my history (which I won't defend, because it is mostly true) in the attempt to discredit anything that I am posting and give reasonable doubt to others. Which is (imho) irrelevant to case.

Further down your investigation, and according to your "findings" (even privately) you have ensured me and everyone else that BC.game has case of me so strong that I can't win it (based on what you've seen of course, I don't want to say you did anything wrong).

Now, let me present to the public their defense evidence in case against me sent back in September 13, 2024:





I am simply going to ask several questions which I already raised countless times over the course of few weeks of having this thread open:

1 - If they did had such an evidence in the very beginning, why wouldn't they provide it and basically kill this case from a very get-go?
2 - Or even better, knowing that they might be declared bankrupt and having all that evidence against me and other players, why wouldn't they open up bank account in Curacao (where they were licensed at a time), deposit amount of claims and fight it in court?
3 - Why wouldn't they provided such evidence before this case even went to court, aka response to my demand letter, or even before when I was the one initiating conversation in attempt to figure out the actual reason?
4 - Image provided in the evidence is blurred, yet there is a clear picture showing that two out of 3 accounts "linking" to me are banned, yet third one is not? Why would that be so?
5 - One better, why would they hide the other two accounts which I still claim were mine while one of those two was unwillingly and unknowingly created because of the technical error (bug)?

These are the questions I already asked like several times, to which you nor them could ever answer to me.

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your help in trying to resolve this matter to the point where you helped me build even stronger case against them and pursue it even further, but bias towards BC.game exists.

To be perfectly transparent with the others (and so to say hypocrite), I was willing to settle for 1/3rd of the claim, or even 1/2 of it with clause that would keep my mouth shut and take the blame for something I didn't do. I was hypocrite but this case really started to burn my time and money is something I need right now, so I was willing to throw my name even deeper down the drain just to get this finally closed.

I was wrong. Now after proving to what lengths they are ready to AVOID (not fight, but avoid) legal repercussions, I would really be laughing if you or anyone else would tell me that I was in wrong from a very beginning - they are scums, criminals.


@AHOY - Well, I see the problem, but that's something nobody's unable to control, and is kinda sad. Signature ad campaign along with constant bonuses does buy the reputation here. Although this is a free speech forum, I don't think that distancing itself as being one from the obvious scams should be a way to go. Especially since it's directly effecting its users. I am new and should not be a judge to it, especially since I am far from being clean guy, but at least some involvement should be taken here for other users.

From what we discussed and what was said, I can confirm that holydarkness attempted to initiate settlement privately, as an idea of his based on my previous attempts and my willingness to finally close this chapter of life, as it becomes really exhausting. While appreciated, I never received any response to offers I presented through him, even though I believe they were more than generous and actually beneficial only to BCGame, knowing that I never did something wrong.

As for permission @holydarkness, as I said privately, it is up to you whether or not to post it publicly, so you're free to do just that.

Now, I am going to throw something else out, which I was not willing to do because it would put a bad image.

Unfortunately @holydarkness, I have to agree with sentiment people are giving out to you here, although I would LOVE not to. To rewind this whole situation, lets start from a beginning of my case.

When I initiated post several times and privately passed you documentation in regards to the legal case in Curacao (bankruptcy ruling, my demand letter and other documentation), you have clearly ignored the fact that the ruling was based on cases brought by us (claimants) against BC.game and it was nowhere said that they should pay us. Last part, you are partially true, because I was unable to disclose such documentation to someone, but you were wrong that bankruptcy wasn't because of our claims.

I clearly showed it was.

On another note, I brought up in this thread several publications in regards to that bankruptcy, and you were persisting that we stay "on my case", even though it was related to my case directly. But I followed and created separate thread in [Reputation] forum section just not to keep mud in water.

After all said and done to keep this thread focused on my case, you brought up my history (which I won't defend, because it is mostly true) in the attempt to discredit anything that I am posting and give reasonable doubt to others. Which is (imho) irrelevant to case.

Further down your investigation, and according to your "findings" (even privately) you have ensured me and everyone else that BC.game has case of me so strong that I can't win it (based on what you've seen of course, I don't want to say you did anything wrong).

Now, let me present to the public their defense evidence in case against me sent back in September 13, 2024:





I am simply going to ask several questions which I already raised countless times over the course of few weeks of having this thread open:

1 - If they did had such an evidence in the very beginning, why wouldn't they provide it and basically kill this case from a very get-go?
2 - Or even better, knowing that they might be declared bankrupt and having all that evidence against me and other players, why wouldn't they open up bank account in Curacao (where they were licensed at a time), deposit amount of claims and fight it in court?
3 - Why wouldn't they provided such evidence before this case even went to court, aka response to my demand letter, or even before when I was the one initiating conversation in attempt to figure out the actual reason?
4 - Image provided in the evidence is blurred, yet there is a clear picture showing that two out of 3 accounts "linking" to me are banned, yet third one is not? Why would that be so?
5 - One better, why would they hide the other two accounts which I still claim were mine while one of those two was unwillingly and unknowingly created because of the technical error (bug)?

These are the questions I already asked like several times, to which you nor them could ever answer to me.

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your help in trying to resolve this matter to the point where you helped me build even stronger case against them and pursue it even further, but bias towards BC.game exists.

To be perfectly transparent with the others (and so to say hypocrite), I was willing to settle for 1/3rd of the claim, or even 1/2 of it with clause that would keep my mouth shut and take the blame for something I didn't do. I was hypocrite but this case really started to burn my time and money is something I need right now, so I was willing to throw my name even deeper down the drain just to get this finally closed.

I was wrong. Now after proving to what lengths they are ready to AVOID (not fight, but avoid) legal repercussions, I would really be laughing if you or anyone else would tell me that I was in wrong from a very beginning - they are scums, criminals.


@AHOY - Well, I see the problem, but that's something nobody's unable to control, and is kinda sad. Signature ad campaign along with constant bonuses does buy the reputation here. Although this is a free speech forum, I don't think that distancing itself as being one from the obvious scams should be a way to go. Especially since it's directly effecting its users. I am new and should not be a judge to it, especially since I am far from being clean guy, but at least some involvement should be taken here for other users.