This make sense to me because I expect that land that must be purchase ought to pass some criteria of selection that will be done through feasibility studies. In other words, the land must be viable to be selected as that is the only way such land can be put into productive use that will grow the value of the NFT tied to such land. I think water logged areas may not pass the selection criteria because such be capital intensive to develop.

Who really initiated this idea of LanDao settling for rural areas, did LandDao actually say this in any of their post that, they are more interested in rural lands?
The last I checked and could remember was that, they said they are interested in purchasing any good and properly documented as well as government registered land provided it meets their criteria regardless of the location, and settlement, they would purchase.

I also agree with you guys that sand filled Water areas are actually good sites for developments and I think I wouldn’t have to be scared of the foundation of the structure in as much as a well experienced architect and engineer is used for those projects and I know of cities that was formerly water settlement but now, it’s been sand field and transformed to great and beautiful cities.

I don’t know how LandDao intends to Utilize their bought lands that are yet to be purchased from them but whatever the case might be,I trust the team to know absolutely what they’re in for.

I don't think a property in a water logged area could be suitable for the LandDAO team, not just for them but for the buyers that would be interested to be a land parcel. A water logged area may requires huge amounts of sand to refill the area before it will be suitable for any building construction.

If you want to sell a land or you have a land you want the team contributors to review, it must be a good and cheap land that will be suitable for whether building or recreational purposes.

Most properties which some people consider to be waterfront properties now are from this level, where they buy properties around water areas, sand fill some of the areas and leave others to preserve nature, which they can later develop those sand-filled lands and build on it and leave the view on. Those areas are most times more expensive than land situated in dry ground; no place is hard to develop.

I can agree that waterlog areas could be very interesting for development since most of the towns that are notable in cities are waterlog areas converted to beaches or penthouse or even amusemrnt park but then the effects it usually very heavy on the foundation of this buildings which sometimes lead to collapse. however in rural areas which LandDao is focused on purchasing lands it's even rare to see lands that are close to water areas because the uplands are always still very free for grab. In contrast to this LandDao according to there white paper have teams that verify there lands before it's up for grabs.