Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 09/06/2025, 15:15:10 UTC
🔹 The Pros:

1:    Mass adoption of crypto rails without volatility

2:   Onboarding for emerging markets and unbanked populations

3:   Enabling real-time settlement and 24/7 finance for global commerce

4:   Potential to challenge SWIFT, PayPal, and even national currencies

🔸 The Cons:

5:    Centralized issuers (Circle, Tether) can freeze funds or blacklist addresses

6:    Regulatory capture: permissioned access, surveillance risk, KYC friction

7:    Dilution of the decentralized ethos — most stablecoins are just digital dollars

8:    Potential sidelining of Bitcoin, ETH, and real decentralized currencies

I numbered your points so i can answer them separately

1: What does this even mean?
2: When people are unbanked they are usually unbanked for a same reason that could cause freezing of their stablecoins as well.
23: When people are unbanked they are usually unbanked forIt's not a same reason that could cause freezing of their stablecoins as wellreal time settlement when it needs to wait some blocks to be confirmed.
4: This is not scaling like SWIFT. That's just insanity.
3: It's not a real time settlement when it needs to wait some blocks to be confirmed.
5: While this is a con, it's only reason stablecoins will be even allowed.
46: This is not scaling like SWIFTSame goes with this. ThatYou see regulatory compliance as a con. Use something like bitcoin if that's just insanitya problem.
7: Let's be real: Stable coins have nothing to do with crypto ethos. They are just an something developed for traders. I don't think they never meant to even to be seen as payment method. Just a fiat money hedge. Paired against the fluctuation of btc.
5: While this is a con, it's only reason stablecoins will be even allowed.<brb>8<br/b>6: Same goes with this. You see regulatory compliance as a con. Use something like bitcoin if that's a problem.

7: Let's be real: Stable coins have nothing to do with crypto ethos. They are just an something developed for traders. I don't think they never meant to even to be seen as payment method. Just a fiat money hedge. Paired against the fluctuation of btc.

8:
Stablecoins are literally build on them. How would tokens sideline the underlying blockchain?
Original archived Re: Stablecoins Are Going Mainstream — Is This Good for Crypto?
Scraped on 09/06/2025, 15:10:14 UTC
🔹 The Pros:

1:    Mass adoption of crypto rails without volatility

2:   Onboarding for emerging markets and unbanked populations

3:   Enabling real-time settlement and 24/7 finance for global commerce

4:   Potential to challenge SWIFT, PayPal, and even national currencies

🔸 The Cons:

5:    Centralized issuers (Circle, Tether) can freeze funds or blacklist addresses

6:    Regulatory capture: permissioned access, surveillance risk, KYC friction

7:    Dilution of the decentralized ethos — most stablecoins are just digital dollars

8:    Potential sidelining of Bitcoin, ETH, and real decentralized currencies

I numbered your points so i can answer them separately

1: What does this even mean?

2: When people are unbanked they are usually unbanked for a same reason that could cause freezing of their stablecoins as well.

3: It's not a real time settlement when it needs to wait some blocks to be confirmed.

4: This is not scaling like SWIFT. That's just insanity.

5: While this is a con, it's only reason stablecoins will be even allowed.

6: Same goes with this. You see regulatory compliance as a con. Use something like bitcoin if that's a problem.

7: Let's be real: Stable coins have nothing to do with crypto ethos. They are just an something developed for traders. I don't think they never meant to even to be seen as payment method. Just a fiat money hedge. Paired against the fluctuation of btc.

8: Stablecoins are literally build on them. How would tokens sideline the underlying blockchain?