As I'm still newbie in terms of "cutting" quotes, I'll address them in order.
That's fine. If it helps for future reference, you can open the quote with
[quote author=gh0573d link=topic=5543815.msg65467853#msg65467853 date=1749510514]
which is created when you click the quote button.
Close the quote (for each quote you create) with
[/quote]
1 - It contains personally identifiable information on parties involved - specifically UBO of Blockdance and Director of Fenice Tech Limited (although director's name is already public). I am willing to share this finding for confirmation with admin/mod. Also, please note that this finding includes involvement of illegal activities by their lawyer at a time.
I see. Yes, don't post personally identifiable information as it will result in your thread being moved to the
Investigations board which is off limits to the public and even some low level ranks, resulting in reduced visibility. Though if you want to publish this information (or want someone to publish it for you) I fully support you doing so, and would be happy to post that information in that board (as it's allowed there) considering bc.game are basically a criminal organization.
2 - Many people follow steps on trying to recover their account, steps being: inquire casino, ADR request. Very few stops there thinking that ADRs decision is final, although none of them ever seen any supporting evidence in cases against them when ADR decides it's (Rejected). I've seen few examples here on Bitcointalk where after "ruling" was made that there is supporting evidence to reject the claim, player replied "I am sure I did nothing wrong" and just went on their way either playing somewhere else or not playing at all. Those who goes to collect their winnings legally, in most cases (when casino is reasonable enough) either see the evidence even before it hits the court (response to legal demand) or settle. In case of BC.game, none of the evidence ever existed even when it was presented to the court (in my case), and only appeared after I have publicly called them out or seek ADR process months after legal course.
I agree with all of that. Legal action is not an easy process from the view of time or resources. Many would accept the outcome even if they disagree with it. Some might not understand and give up. That is my problem with the notion of what bc.game do and prey on. They "settle" here on bitcointalk when the matter reaches the public view (for smaller cases than this one, at least) though when it doesn't, it's money in their pocket.
3 - Unfortunately, this is their MO. I am (at this moment) aware of three other cases, one being $600k and others $750k and $500k being pursued legally.
I wonder how many other cases there might be if 100% of victims had a case running. That aside, if this is their MO and these cases are running, what do you say or think about those who are promoting bc.game? Do you think that the ethical thing to do is pause those efforts? Would you go as far to say that they are even guilty in a way for doing so? I am quite sure that promoters are aware of the scam nature (though won't say much about it since those scammed funds are probably what's enabling bc.game to have such an exorbitant advertising budget), though with benefit of the doubt, I'd like to hear your opinion.
4 - Well, it's not moving quickly. In regards to that "small victory" court only assessed whether or not we had a valid reasons to file such request, or it was baseless, and made decision to schedule a hearing where we will be providing evidence on which court will determine whether or not to grant such request. This was expedited hearing, and if such is processed, assets of Fenice Tech Limited (including domains bc.game and bcgame.com) will be frozen until actual case against them is finalized. So yeah, although ruling on our request will be swift, waiting for final decision will still be slow.
I see, this makes a lot more sense. Thank you for explaining this and everything prior.
We're also working with bankruptcy trustee to proceed with asset recovery phase, where we have enough supporting evidence to get the domain name bc.game under her control, and possibly attempt to sell it in order to fund the claims against their legal entities in Curacao.
While a premium domain, I doubt the domain would go for much if the casino is implicated. The only way I could see it going for a lot is if they buy it back themselves, or if a competitor buys it to take over the brand. Both of which will only prolong the centralized crypto casino problem. That's my opinion at least, not entirely relevant or within the scope of your goals (which I'm not judging/is fair given that you would be trying to recover funds for victims of bc.game).