Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: [Call to action] BC.game is not entity that should be trusted.
by
gh0573d
on 10/06/2025, 08:41:19 UTC
I see. Yes, don't post personally identifiable information as it will result in your thread being moved to the Investigations board which is off limits to the public and even some low level ranks, resulting in reduced visibility. Though if you want to publish this information (or want someone to publish it for you) I fully support you doing so, and would be happy to post that information in that board (as it's allowed there) considering bc.game are basically a criminal organization.

I'd be happy to pass it on, please DM me your e-mail.
I wonder how many other cases there might be if 100% of victims had a case running. That aside, if this is their MO and these cases are running, what do you say or think about those who are promoting bc.game? Do you think that the ethical thing to do is pause those efforts? Would you go as far to say that they are even guilty in a way for doing so? I am quite sure that promoters are aware of the scam nature (though won't say much about it since those scammed funds are probably what's enabling bc.game to have such an exorbitant advertising budget), though with benefit of the doubt, I'd like to hear your opinion.

Probably hundreds. I already showed (either here or in another topic) comparison on number of complaints at ADRs between Stake (industry dominant according to Tanzanite) vs BC.game, where BC.game has 10x more complaints opened against them.

While a premium domain, I doubt the domain would go for much if the casino is implicated. The only way I could see it going for a lot is if they buy it back themselves, or if a competitor buys it to take over the brand. Both of which will only prolong the centralized crypto casino problem. That's my opinion at least, not entirely relevant or within the scope of your goals (which I'm not judging/is fair given that you would be trying to recover funds for victims of bc.game).

Well, your opinion is kinda goal. If you look at their sponsorships, most of their sponsors advertise "BC.GAME", a domain directly. If said domain is either seized (aka suspended pending court decision) or controlled/auctioned by bankruptcy trustee, there is a high possibility of either them trying to acquire it back and settling for full amount on cases + interests or simply selling the domain name to (possibly) competitor along with the brand ownership, to which they would own full rights to BC.GAME brand and any further operation of actual BC.GAME would be further involvement in crime operation: brand infringement.