I mean, they're in two finals, surely you can't call them a weak team? That would mean everyone who finished third (or less) or failed to enter the finals is a terrible team. Feels weird if you can only classify one team as a strong team every season because they won some silverware.
I dislike this all-or-nothing judgment. It would be horrible for a team to sack a coach every season if they failed to win something.
I also don't understand that point of view. People are looking at only what happened at the end. Yeah it wasn't a good ending for Inter in the Serie A and Champions League. But these guys were still one of the most successful 2 teams in both tournaments.

Inter didn't sack Simone Inzaghi after it either. He just wanted to resign and accept Al-Hilal's offer. I respect his success in the Champions League. Eliminating Bayern Munich and the strongest Barcelona in the recent years are both top works.
That's right, absolutely right. A team that made it to the Champions League final, even if they had a bad and unforgettable defeat in the final. Simeone Inzaghi has brought his team the best possible results in the league, in the Champions League this season. That's why it seems a bit cruel to me to see only the Champions League final defeat.
They eliminated Barcelona, who were very good, what else could they have done. PSG cancelled Inter's game in the final, I didn't expect that to happen either, but if this game was played again, maybe the result would have been different.