This way, each time i post in the chat a forum topic/answer, my bot gives me an answer with my style.
Its not "your style" though, its AI's style, which is why your posts were detected by AI detectors.
but i want to make noise to make us all understand where we are with AI, and understand that this is a fight that we can't win.
Uh... pretty obviously we
can win it as all your posts were deleted... A giant waste of your time & everyone else's IMO.
My prompt was really basic and that's why i got detected by the users (I was expecting to get busted by the mods or admins), but i can make a humanized prompt that avoids the AI detection, a prompt that takes all my
spelling mistakes and adopt it as style and with that the AI bust tools will have real troubles.
I'm not sure you
can make a prompt that avoids detection. There's no such thing as a "humanized" prompt, because all the output is coming from AI. Its AI doing what it thinks are "human things," which is what it was doing anyway. You will have to manually make changes to the output to evade the detectors.
Can we win the war against AI?
What would Sarah Connor do?
If a user have a bad spelling and use AI to correct his spelling, is he cheating?
Why not just use a normal spellcheck tool? The difference is AI tends to do more than correct spelling errors; it completely transforms the wording of posts, removing what makes them human and replacing it with a cookie cutter style that is easily noticeable by those who know what to look for.
If a user reads the thread, generates an answer with AI and changes some words to humanize it, is he cheating?
This happens all the time, and these posts are frequently removed by moderators. It doesn't really matter whether its "cheating" or not.
If a casino use AI to generate the Image for his main topic is that a problem for the forum?
One thing I've noticed is that services / coins that rely on AI to write their ANNs for them tend not to get deleted. And that's fine -- its up to the reader whether or not they want to use a product made by someone too lazy or verbally incompetent to use their own words to describe it.
I totally understand the problem with AI on the forum, and that's that some of us gets a payment for our post, but if our post have better quality and are more attractive for the people then isn't that better for the casino promotion?
No, because AI will never help a shitpost become more than a shitpost. It will never increase the IQ of a post. It is just repackaging spammy content in an extremely formulaic way, so I'd argue its worse than a regular shitpost.
This is a really complex topic guys, and from my point of view is hard to understand what's right and what's wrong about AI. And I'm sure that today we have a lot of undetected AI users.
That much is true.
The fact that we use tools like
Copyleaks, GPTZero, Sapling.ai, and Quillbot is not guarantee that we are protected, because the ones who decide to implement AI have access to these tools to, and they could work on their post until get something lower than 50% and the make the post.
Yes but shitposters don't really do that because if it takes more time than writing a regular shitpost, then it defeats the purpose of using AI in the first place, which is to crank out shitposts as quickly as possible.
So, how can we really fight against AI? We could use an automatic process where we verify each new post and the post history of the user and make an AI score, even the user profile could have that score to let us know which users are bots and which are 100% humas.
I'd say using an automated anything is not the way to go about it. It all comes down to whether the moderators decide something is "spam" or not.