My point here is, we have to ask to ourselves:
Can we win the war against AI?
If a user have a bad spelling and use AI to correct his spelling, is he cheating?
If a user reads the thread, generates an answer with AI and changes some words to humanize it, is he cheating?
If a casino use AI to generate the Image for his main topic is that a problem for the forum?
This is not really a war against Ai per say, rather just guidelines for managing Ai, which is necessary for intellectual growth to continue.
The first question is understandable, it is like you are using any grammar assistance which even in the current time as integrated Ai for better service.
The second is a no, solely dependency on Ai is cheating, where does intellectual property stands here?.
The third is basically up to the casino themselves, if they are using this in their casino, I think it may be okay but don't forget there maybe general guidelines casino has to follow for their start up. Although, if this is used only in our forum then I think it would still be deleted. Sometimes, casino platforms that join the forum are aware about the rule (either been informed by someone or has gone through the forum rule) or they learn the other way round when their post is deleted.
I totally understand the problem with AI on the forum, and that's that some of us gets a payment for our post, but if our post have better quality and are more attractive for the people then isn't that better for the casino promotion?
Intellectual posts from an individual is different from that of Ai, like in academy settings AI are flagged negative when individuals are solely reliant in it and this forum doesn't support this.
How one improve their cognitive skills if they are solely reliant on Ai?
That is a downtrend for human reasoning.
This is a really complex topic guys, and from my point of view is hard to understand what's right and what's wrong about AI. And I'm sure that today we have a lot of undetected AI users. The fact that we use tools like
Copyleaks, GPTZero, Sapling.ai, and Quillbot is not guarantee that we are protected, because the ones who decide to implement AI have access to these tools to, and they could work on their post until get something lower than 50% and the make the post.
So, how can we really fight against AI? We could use an automatic process where we verify each new post and the post history of the user and make an AI score, even the user profile could have that score to let us know which users are bots and which are 100% humas.
Similarly, just as how these are used to improved Ai and it's the same way these Ai are used to improve Ai detectors. It's in a constant loop of how scam and anti-scam process goes. Scammer finds a new exploit to steal, cybersecurity experts finds these flaws and how to protect users.