the epic about casinos without kyc verification has already been understood by everyone, that they misled players. now the issue of arbitrage bets on sports is on the agenda, how are they going to prove it, when a person made only 3 bets on sports and it was enough for them to make their verdict, and these were ordinary bets, not some errors in the line, everything was within the bounds of decency, the provider would have corrected the errors in the line, but it was the arbitrage that the casino itself saw. how?
Have you played in other casinos before? Were the accounts on those other casinos still accessible and working normally? Or were you like... limited on those sportsbet section of those casinos? Help me understand how you ended up with this [borrowing your words] cheap casino while there are other bigger casinos out there and/or web3 betting platforms if you prefer non-KYC gambling.
yes i played in a similar casino with such provider who limited my max bet to 0.1$. i think it's because of frequent bets or frequent wins. but after the limitation i calmly withdrew my winnings, if there were any problems i think the provider would have cancelled my winnings. it turns out that my winnings were just taken by xyes casino