Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 13/06/2025, 19:28:20 UTC
When it comes to comparing Bitcoin and Shitcoins we need to have a look at parameters like scarcity. Only Bitcoin is really scarce, Shitcoins can be launched over and over again, even when a single Shitcoin has a max supply. Bitcoin is limited to only 21M coins and not Shitcoin can be scarcer.
So, in terms of scarcity, Bitcoin is king.
So, in terms of scarcity, Bitcoin is king.
Whenever I come across a random project, basically shitcoins, I'm always tempted to check their supply. Truth is, I always get scared for investors whenever I see a project with a max supply of infinity (∞). You can't just imagine the level of manipulation that would happen behind the scheme. Max supply that exceeds 100Million scares me tbh.
I want to believe that there is this relief that we get when we remember that Bitcoin supply is fixed, with an amount as low as 21M. Truth is, there is no debate, there was never a competition from day one.
Original archived Re: Only Bitcoin is really scarce, Shitcoins aren't
Scraped on 13/06/2025, 19:23:27 UTC
When it comes to comparing Bitcoin and Shitcoins we need to have a look at parameters like scarcity. Only Bitcoin is really scarce, Shitcoins can be launched over and over again, even when a single Shitcoin has a max supply. Bitcoin is limited to only 21M coins and not Shitcoin can be scarcer.
So, in terms of scarcity, Bitcoin is king.
So, in terms of scarcity, Bitcoin is king.
Whenever I come across a random project, basically shitcoins, I'm always tempted to check their supply. Truth is, I always get scared for investors whenever I see a project with a max supply of infinity (∞). You can't just imagine the level of manipulation that would happen behind the scheme. Max supply that exceeds 100Million scares me tbh.
I want to believe that there is this relief that we get when we remember that Bitcoin supply is fixed. Truth is, there is no debate, there was never a competition from day one.