Those with greater discretionary income have more options to buy bitcoin and even more options to screw things up but still end up accumulating more bitcoin than those with smaller levels of discretionary income..... yet at the same time, it seems to me that a decent number of governments, institutions and individuals are going to get ahead of the similarly-situated (or better off) status quo governments, institutions and individuals based on their level of aggressiveness in accumulating bitcoin within their means and without screwing things up, so they may well be way smaller and with fewer resources, yet bitcoin may well end up contribute towards their relative advancement in the pack of relative comparisons.
I believe you
're quite right about this , so
many don't really understand what makes bitcoin to be outstanding from others.Having a discretionary income is important for bitcoin investment however how we used our discretionary income should be of great concerns
also. It is possible for individuals with smaller levels of discretionary income to be able to outsmart those with greater discretionary income by being consistent, persistent with their bitcoin accumulation and being dedicated at it for a longer period of time like 10yrs or more. So the size of one discretionary income may not really matter that much to an extent.But rather the level of effort that ones has put in and individual risks tolerance.