Being a source (merit) is indeed difficult if it is difficult and easy if it is easy, it becomes a source of merit to be the center of monitoring of other members, What's more in the local parts, many eyes monitor you, there are many different presumptions and understanding what else Merit is given above 10-50, ALT is a special concern for the merit given.

Now regardless of decent posts or not, I know a lot of members who are included in the source of merit, but they are fair without the negative responses from other members, especially local.
How: To be fair without suspicion they give merit 1-2-3 or 4-6 to all members.

I mean like this looks fair: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=459836

Like that is not striking, one or two other parts given 30-50 depending on the situation and post.

If it's like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296843.msg55758488#msg55758488

I think the post below is more worth accepting.
That's where the presumption and jealousy occur.

Being a source (merit) is indeed difficult if it is difficult and easy if it is easy, it becomes a source of merit to be the center of monitoring of other members, What's more in the local parts, many eyes monitor you, there are many different presumptions and understanding what else Merit is given above 10-50, ALT is a special concern for the merit given.

Now regardless of decent posts or not, I know a lot of members who are included in the source of merit, but they are fair without the negative responses from other members, especially local.
How: To be fair without suspicion they give merit 1-2-3 or 4-6 to all members.

I mean like this looks fair: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=459836

Like that is not striking, one or two other parts given 30-50 depending on the situation and post.

If it's like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296843.msg55758488#msg55758488

I think the post below is more worth accepting.
That's where the presumption and jealousy occur.