Quote from: BADecker on Today at 02:30:28 AM

Quote from: paxmao on June 26, 2025, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: BADecker on June 18, 2025, 08:31:05 PM

Quote from: tvbcof on June 18, 2025, 06:19:39 PM

Well I'll be go'ed to hell; looks like hazelnuts grow in Iran too! Â Or, this is a fake vid.

I was going to suggest that for every GBU-57A/B the U.S. 'supplies to Israel', Russia matches with an Oreshnik. Â No need. Â Indeed, seems possible that the flow is reversed and Iran supplies them to Russia? Â A practical advantage of the Oreshik is that one need not supply a $1,000,000,000 strategic bomber along with the bomb. Â Handy.

Â Iran launched new ballistic missiles towards Israel
Â https://www.bitchute.com/video/7uTfA1aGFCvX

Edit:Â Â More first-hand observations.Â Â Around the 12:00 mark:

Â Â Iran's Missiles RAIN HELL on Tel Aviv, US War IMMINENT w/ Mohammad Marandi, Lowkey & Ali
Â Â https://www.bitchute.com/video/WtvlmbHPE1fe

Sounds like Oreshnik, or what we (who pay attention to the Zionazi operations in former Ukraine...aka, 'new Israel'?) know as Oreshnik.

Does it really go at mach 10.5? Why doesn't it use nukes?

Some folks say that the nukes used in Japan were really TNT or the like. Maybe nukes are useless, and it is only the propaganda threat of nukes that make them dangerous.

Cool

Of course BA, the wilder the theory the better and if it is done by "folks", who would doubt ever? Â Grin

Hiroshima bomb yield was 15 kTon. Maybe your "folks" can explain how anyone loaded 15.000 Tons (that is 15 million kilograms) of TNT on a WWII plane. Or on any plane for that matter. As a clue, a B52 can carry 32000 kilos... so your theory is that the US send modern planes using a time machine to WW II - precisely they sent 500 of these planes in secret, loaded them to the top and then made them all bomb 2 times Japan - but, am this is why I am suspicious Â Grin

they all had to drop it at the same time.

Oh Oh... sorry I am just laughing my but out as I find that ALL the conventional bombs ever used in WW II are estimated around 20 kTon. So after time-travelling those 500 B52 to the past, you would need to create from nothing more bombs than all the ones used in the war and then bomb at the same time, etc.

BA, you are the only one here that does not "get it".

Ballistic missiles usually exceed Macth 10 - this is technology from the 40s and 50s, but there are two reasons why Iran cannot use nukes in their missiles:

a) The most obvious, they do not have the required fissile material - thus they do not have nukes yet.
b) If you bothered to read the thread, the technology to use a nuke in a missile is not that trivial. The "gun" detonator cannot be used and there are quite a few technical "details" to find out about.

Anyway, the nuclear programme would not be that difficult if Ruzzia really wanted Iran to have nukes. My guess is that they don't, nor does anyone else tbh.

Nya, nya, scardy cat. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but all your yammer about fake nukes can't hurt me.

Note that you are right about Russia not wanting Ukraine to have nukes. If they did, they would send them, themselves, in Oreshnik.

Cool

So, your answer to a scientific and very basic explanation is that? Grin

You are a work of art BA.

Familiarise yourselve with radioactive clouds and the basics of international diplomacy and you will understand why is such a terrible idea to use any nuke in Ukraine.

You are not going to do it, but just in case I will leave in here the archives about the bombs dropped in Japan.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25751654.2019.1681226