As of 22 March 2025, 15.613 children, 8.304 women and 3.839 elderly Palestinians were killed
so you're saying that these were actually intended targets of Israel's precision missiles? 
or is this what's considered "limited" collateral damage with precision missiles now? What's the ratio of Israel's precision weapons fired to collateral damage of just women, children and elderly (not even counting 22.265 of innocent men)? And how does it compare to other conflicts. Hint: don't look up answers to scary questions if you don't want to loose faith in humanity.seems you admit to only seeking picky answers that dont offend your opinions, rather than seeking the crucial details which may sway your views
so atleast realise that isreal used its expensive technologically advanced weapons on key targets in iran because those targets are worth the price to strike. EG taking out the nuclear regime is a price worth paying multiple millions for
however the hamas crap happening in gaza(philistine(palestine)) is where isreal take cheap shots at hamas, but more collateral damage risk is implied
isreal actually do send warnings prior to strikes on hamas. warning residents to evactuate the area designated as a target site of hamas occupation..
hamas are the ones that threaten residents not to leave. hamas want human shields in an attempt to hope isreal wont strike hamas. hamas want collateral damage so they can propagandise that isreal are intentionally striking innocents
its hamas that are the targets and isreal send warnings before the attack.
hamas claim that evacuating is a form of genocide.. when obviously evacuating is a form of seeking safety
if hamas were not cowards, hiding amongst residents and instead sending all hamas troops to some empty area battle field like real soldiers. the collateral damage would be minimised