seems you admit to only seeking picky answers that dont offend your opinions, rather than seeking the crucial details which may sway your views

so atleast realise that isreal used its expensive technologically advanced weapons on key targets in iran because those targets are worth the price to strike. EG taking out the nuclear regime is a price worth paying multiple millions for

however the hamas crap happening in gaza(philistine(palestine)) is where isreal take cheap shots at hamas, but more collateral damage risk is implied
isreal actually do send warnings prior to strikes on hamas. warning residents to evactuateevacuate the area designated as a target site of hamas occupation..
hamas are the ones that threaten residents not to leave. hamas want human shields in an attempt to hope isreal wont strike hamas. hamas want collateral damage so they can propagandise that isreal are intentionally striking innocents

its hamas that are the targets and isreal send warnings before the attack.
hamas claim that evacuating is a form of genocide.. when obviously evacuating is a form of seeking safety

isreal have offered peace deals, hamas decline.
isreal have sent supplies to last palestinians until atleast october.. hama stole and hoard it
isreal have sent more supplies and defending the supplies. when thousands of people come running up(deservedly so as they are hungry and fear waiting in line will result in not everyone being fed) the defense teams of the isreal supplies first give warnings ot approach peacefully, but then when people do continue running in their thousands. warning shots are then fired infront of the oncoming crowds. and then when that didnt work yes some were shot

my personal view of those innocents fired upon in recent aid distribution centres is that the supplies should just be dropped off and spread out as heaps of supplies on the ground and defense teams just step back and lets the crowds self govern taking what they can carry,

however because that has been tried and it ended up that some of the people in the crowds were hamas that wanted to kill the aid workers and defense teams
(much like peaceful protests in america end up having a few radical anarchists that just want to throw bricks and molotov cocktails at us authorities)
and where hamas then steal the food to hoard(but not for palestinians) the new response to crowds running at aid suppliers is to warn oncoming growds to act peacefully but be determined to warn that any escalation would be treated as a threat to the aid/defense teams.

if hamas were not cowards, hiding amongst residents and instead sending all hamas troops to some empty area battle fieldbattlefield like real soldiers. the collateral damage would be minimised

seems you admit to only seeking picky answers that dont offend your opinions, rather than seeking the crucial details which may sway your views

so atleast realise that isreal used its expensive technologically advanced weapons on key targets in iran because those targets are worth the price to strike. EG taking out the nuclear regime is a price worth paying multiple millions for

however the hamas crap happening in gaza(philistine(palestine)) is where isreal take cheap shots at hamas, but more collateral damage risk is implied
isreal actually do send warnings prior to strikes on hamas. warning residents to evactuate the area designated as a target site of hamas occupation..
hamas are the ones that threaten residents not to leave. hamas want human shields in an attempt to hope isreal wont strike hamas. hamas want collateral damage so they can propagandise that isreal are intentionally striking innocents

its hamas that are the targets and isreal send warnings before the attack.
hamas claim that evacuating is a form of genocide.. when obviously evacuating is a form of seeking safety

if hamas were not cowards, hiding amongst residents and instead sending all hamas troops to some empty area battle field like real soldiers. the collateral damage would be minimised