Hello,
We are of course not in a position to comment on what the procedures of other casinos are, what their terms look like or what their policy is when a user breaches their Terms and Conditions.
However, the actions taken by Betby would strongly suggest to us that the suspicious betting behaviour the player was investigated for initially was/is calculated and systematic.
If this behaviour would indeed be coincidental and by chance as they claim, they wouldn't have been limited across all the operators, only at Betpanda.
Therefore we would like to reiterate that we are not a "scam" as is falsely claimed, but simply acting upon suspicious behaviour suspected and investigated (and now confirmed) by our sportsbook provider as per our Terms and Conditions.
We have brought this up several times internally with senior management and with all the information which has been made available to us through various mediums, we are not in a position to offer a refund due to the aforementioned reasons.
We do understand that this is not the outcome you were looking for, but the substantial action taken by Betby validated our suspicions and cemented their decision.
Hence, Betpanda considers the matter closed.
So predictable to use the "limitations" as an excuse. I shared it here just for transparency's sake, since i got nothing to hide, unlike you.
I literally shared my "suspicious betting activity" here for all to see.
I have been playing at betby casinos for 4 years. Always the exact same "betting pattern". It was until i opened this thread that this happen. I'm pretty sure if i kept my mouth shut, i wouldn't get limited anywhere. But i am exposing you as a scam, trash, garbage casino. Everyone who has followed this thread, and others like mine against you, will see exactly what you are. Hopefully this will save many players from playing at your scamhouse.
You say you cannot comment on other casinos procedures and ToS, because you can't. You say:
"However, the actions taken by Betby would strongly suggest to us that the suspicious betting behaviour the player was investigated for initially was/is calculated and systematic.
If this behaviour would indeed be coincidental and by chance as they claim, they wouldn't have been limited across all the operators, only at Betpanda."
Sure, but i can go another route, or point of view. Why did 3 betby casinos paid me after you wrongfully banned me?
Why are you not asking that? If, like you say, it wasn't coincidental and by chance as "whoever they" are, why did they pay? You can't answer. Because you know exactly what you are doing. It's called a scam.
Feel free to share my "suspicious betting activity" with the class.
Enjoy your dirty 1700€. I hope you buy many balloons and confetti to celebrate another successfull scam.