Quote from: Cointxz on Today at 01:46:43 PM

Quote from: muridogg on Today at 06:17:23 AM

People here are well paid to ad for casinos. Do not take them seriously. I suggest you to open a scam thread here detailing everything, from signup until the final ban.
Maybe you can find contact with someone that represents BetPanda here (not likely tho, they left here and just left their Marketing people)
Or you can follow-up a sue in Costa Rica, maybe that's viable, I am not sure of your case and local jurisdictions.
Good luck.

Tell me without telling me you knew how signature campaign works here in the forum. They are not obligated to do shill post to depend the casino.

Most of the user here is playing fairly that’s why no one encounter a lot of issue against the casino. They depend casinos based on their experience.

We have a lot of casino here that condemned already due to their blatant scam activity against players. The problem on your case was the evidence can be viewed by casino alone so there’s no way for us to judge the situation per your narrative. I suggest to pursue arbitrator action against the casino.

The fact that you say "users that play fairly don't encounter issues against casino" means either you don't gamble or you are just dishonest. I've been victim of some casinos despite never doing anything against their terms.
The fact that I know Betpanda's common practices based on multiple reviews and friends' experience make me 100% believe, nova1sz, because they line up with what I've found myself.

Quote from: Wiwo on Today at 02:48:00 PM

Quote from: Cointxz on Today at 01:46:43 PM

Quote from: muridogg on Today at 06:17:23 AM

People here are well paid to ad for casinos. Do not take them seriously. I suggest you to open a scam thread here detailing everything, from signup until the final ban.
Maybe you can find contact with someone that represents BetPanda here (not likely tho, they left here and just left their Marketing people)
Or you can follow-up a sue in Costa Rica, maybe that's viable, I am not sure of your case and local jurisdictions.
Good luck.

Tell me without telling me you knew how signature campaign works here in the forum. They are not obligated to do shill post to depend the casino.

Most of the user here is playing fairly that’s why no one encounter a lot of issue against the casino. They depend casinos based on their experience.

We have a lot of casino here that condemned already due to their blatant scam activity against players. The problem on your case was the evidence can be viewed by casino alone so there’s no way for us to judge the situation per your narrative. I suggest to pursue arbitrator action against the casino.

I have played on BC.game both in fiat and cryptocurrency and to this extent i can speak boldly and backing it up with evidence that i am an active gambler on most of the casinos that i have warn their signatures both now and in the past, between just accusing members of this forum of shilling for casinos because of signatures is totally out of base and you lack merits to speek about this forum and it members like that.

From the look of things you muridogg is the one that is actually shilling for possible competitors since you have refused to show some level of respectful and valid evidence to support your claims.

I played on multiple sportsbook - to name a few: Rollbit, Fortunejack, Rainbet, BC, Stake, Pinnacle, bet365, betway. None of them take your deposit money if you do anything wrong, none of them ignore scam accusations. If you think I am trying to make people blacklist Betpanda, no, i don't even care about them. I made 2 posts a month ago. I've even talked shit about Chips despite being paid I don't recommend them, they are shit. But BetPanda is on another level, they say they don't KYC on their ToS to then change their whole standpoint saying "we only KYC if you are doing anything wrong" - which is false, because I have a friend that got KYCd before he got paid. They have multiple scam accusations for stupid shit - and don't return the user deposit despite not proving a valid reason on why he got excluded. Even so, it's a shady practice. If you vouch for that, too bad, you have just room temperature IQ.

Search BETPANDA Scam on this same forum and look up. There is valid evidence for everything on what I am saying. They hold a 2.1 score on ag, with multiple unresolved and unanswered disputes.
Anyone that's reading this can do it. DYOR and see what they are up to.